Technology

60052 readers

2859 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

974

There is no fix for Intel’s crashing 13th and 14th Gen CPUs — any damage is permanent (www.theverge.com)

submitted 4 months ago by mox@lemmy.sdf.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

270 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

hmm. not really. I can't beat AMD. Only in power-consumption, sure, but not in real performance.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is where I need it to beat the others

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

even then, strix will look to compete with apple silicon in perf/watt

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 months ago

I need to have a look at that. Thanks!

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

ARM is only more power efficient below 10 to 15 W or so. Above that, doesn't matter much between ARM and x86.

The real benefit is somewhat abstract. Only two companies can make x86, and only one of them knows how to do it well. ARM (and RISC V) opens up the market to more players.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago

technically 3, VIA still has a x86 license, they just don't do consumer parts.