332
submitted 1 year ago by Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca to c/main@lemmy.ca

I've seen that some instances have already done it preemptively.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

Federation with Meta would significantly increase network traffic and storage costs?

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

Then Meta would help everyone cope with the extra workload ... then help some more with a few changes .... then offer some new features ... then help with increased usage ... then offer more features ... then push out the smaller instances and take over everything ... then wall off ActivityPub ... then start charging people and advertisers .. then make billions ... then watch users rebel and start a new system and repeat it all again in 10 or 20 years.

[-] chocoboi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The cirrrcle of lifeeeee...

[-] Xanvial@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

ActivityPub is maintained by W3C not mastodon, or lemmy, or other fediverse system. Meta doesn't need federation to push W3C to do what they want

[-] zaphod@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pretty sure it'd only increase traffic if folks on a fediverse server followed someone on Threads. So unless there's a sudden gigantic flux of fediverse users following Threads users, it shouldn't have a huge near term impact.

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
332 points (97.2% liked)

Lemmy.ca's Main Community

2758 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to lemmy.ca's c/main!

Since everyone on lemmy.ca gets subscribed here, this is the place to chat about the goings on at lemmy.ca, support-type items, suggestions, etc.

Announcements can be found at https://lemmy.ca/c/meta

For support related to this instance, use https://lemmy.ca/c/lemmy_ca_support

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS