392
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by remington@beehaw.org to c/foss@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 18 points 2 months ago

What license do they choose? I clicked though the article to another article (in German) and then to another:

And found this (in German language) part:

Die Software wird unter der sogenannten "Open Source Lizenz GLP V3" allgemein zur Verfügung gestellt.

Is it actually GPLv3 and this is just a typo? Or is this a modified version maybe?

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The law says this:

Soweit möglich und sinnvoll sind international etablierte Lizenztexte zu verwenden. Haftungsansprüche von Lizenznehmern sind auszuschliessen, soweit dies rechtlich möglich ist.

As far as possible and expedient, internationally established licenses are to be used.

That sounds like they're not mandating specific licenses, but the GPL is a reasonable choice

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

The only problem is that there are a number of licenses that purport to be open source, but which don't meet established definitions of the term. The license for Grayjay comes to mind. I'd hope that they blacklist certain licenses like that, rather than enforcing a specific one.

[-] StereoTypo@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago

Huh, I hadn't heard about this. I hope Rossman doesn't think he's above criticism.

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
392 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17709 readers
48 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS