this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
33 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

26560 readers
191 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zikeji@programming.dev 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I got Fira Code, the font I currently use. Guess that makes sense then. Huh.

[–] Mad_Punda@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

Same. At some point I barely saw any differences anymore. I was so surprised to see the font I thought I liked actually being the winner.

[–] who@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

With or without ligatures? Without them, I think it's essentially Fira Mono.

[–] muzzle@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

most of them just look the same to me. Also I can't be arsed to do so many comparisons. I

need a designer to make a proper decision tree where at each first you chose between wildly different families and at every step someone who knows font design highlights what the main differences are.

[–] hobata@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago

Sure you enabled font loading in your uBlock origin? 😁

[–] marlowe221@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Ubuntu Mono for me

[–] Hexarei@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I've used Iosevka for years, unsurprising that I got Ubuntu mono

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

Noto Sans Mono for me

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] whelk@retrolemmy.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

I got this one too, high five

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Source Code Pro, which I have been using for ages. I guess most people end up wanting what they are used to.

[–] howmuchlonger@lemmy.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

Courier Prime… bleh

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

I use "mono-9" in all my terminals, including for emacs. On my Debian trixie system, that maps to DejaVu Sans Mono in the fonts-dejavu-mono package.

$ cat ~/.config/foot/foot.ini
[main]
font=mono-9
$ fc-match mono-9
DejaVuSansMono.ttf: "DejaVu Sans Mono" "Book"
$ fc-list|grep DejaVuSansMono.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Book
$ dpkg -S /usr/share/fonts/truetype/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf
fonts-dejavu-mono: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf
$

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DejaVu_fonts

The DejaVu fonts are a superfamily of fonts designed for broad coverage of the Unicode Universal Character Set. The fonts are derived from Bitstream Vera (sans-serif) and Bitstream Charter (serif), two fonts released by Bitstream under a free license that allowed derivative works based upon them; the Vera and Charter families were limited mainly to the characters in the Basic Latin and Latin-1 Supplement portions of Unicode, roughly equivalent to ISO/IEC 8859-15, and Bitstream's licensing terms allowed the fonts to be expanded upon without explicit authorization.

The full project incorporates the Bitstream Vera license, an extended MIT License, which restricts naming of modified distributions and prohibits individual sale of the typefaces, although they may be embedded within a larger commercial software package (terms also found in the later Open Font License); to the extent that the DejaVu fonts' changes can be separated from the original Bitstream Vera and Charter fonts, these changes have been deeded to the public domain.[1]