Bro the art style on this is amazing, like the hair tuck in the third panel..wow
Comic Strips
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
Rules
-
π Be Nice!
- Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
-
ποΈ Community Standards
- Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
- Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
- Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
- Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
-
𧬠Keep it Real
- Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
-
π½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due
- Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
- Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
-
π Post Formatting
- Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
- Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
- When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
β Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
β Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
-
π¬ Post Frequency/SPAM
- Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 π) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 π) will be removed.
-
π΄ββ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)
- Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
SΓ, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
- Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
-
πΏ Moderation
- We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
- When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists
The following artists are banned from the community.
- Jago
- Stonetoss
It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.
Web Accessibility
Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.
When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:
Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)
Web of Links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
I would treat it like a baby. From what I gather, that wouldn't end-well for me, but the scarier part is that last bit is going to change, at least in-so-far as whether it is capable of intending to manipulate me towards an early grave, and its being "educated" by fools who buy the hype in the mean-time.
Smarter, saner people than I or the hype-machine, I hope you're not letting the chance to even attempt to handle this correctly pass you by. For all our sakes.
GenAI doesn't "know" anything. A 15 year old who spends a year copying his friend's physics homework will learn a tiny bit of physics. GenAI is just generating something new without actually learning information.
It's a fancy auto-complete that looks at the entirety of human writing and guesses what word should come next based on statistical probability. That isn't learning, that's rolling dice 10,000 times and seeing what number comes up most often.
GenAI cannot "intend" anything. It cannot develop consciousness any more than Akinator or a Tickle-Me Elmo can. The correct way to handle this technology is to treat it with reality: as a tool that can quickly look at a lot of stuff and not as a developing mind.
I think of it as outsourced intuition. It provides a first gut feeling response to the question based on what the Internet would say. That can be useful if you need a starting point. It very rarely should be an ending point.
I'm well-aware of all that, but if you think that's not going to change, you're a bigger fool than the AI-evangelists. Even if it doesn't change, the distinction won't matter all-too-soon.
By all means, leave the overblown toy to the delusional right-up-until AI, whether truly intelligent or better-at-faking-it than today, has killed us all.
The danger here is not the tech developing into an uncontrollable beast that will kill us all. There is no way that GenAI can advance far enough to develop conciousness; that's a completely different tech tree. It is not a baby whose development we need to guide, it is a puppet dancing on strings.
The danger is the people in positions of power who are pulling the strings. The idiot C-level admin who thinks GenAI will magically develop consciousness and replaces a bunch of essential staff. The incompetent CEO who can't write an email to save their life believes GenAI is just as useful for all their workers and forces workers to babysit AI Agents. The unscrupulous politicians who relax regulations to allow AI companies to suck up resources that the rest of us need. These are all people who will benefit from the GenAI boom at the cost of literally everyone else.
The focus should be on these irrational, powerful people who are destroying the planet and ruining lives to make their puppet dance a little more convincingly.
It doesn't have to actually-develop consciousness to get both the means and the garbled-non-sense that leads to using them to end-up killing-us-all, friend. Try to keep up.
I must be misunderstanding your meaning because it sounds like you are claiming this tech will eventually become advanced enough to kill people all on its own. I'm making the argument it's the people controlling the tech who will kill us, regardless of what the tech can or cannot do. The tech is largely irrelevant here.
I'm saying how the tech is handled, and by whom, is extremely relavent.
I don't care about or for wide-spread adoption any more than you do, but having only those who self-select out of enthusiasm or are coerced-into it to keep their jobs at the riegns of the mechanical-turk(or Deep Thought, whatever the case remains or becomes) doesn't seem like the smart play to me.
~~You honestly trust these idiots to keep themselves or smarter people between the AI crap and themselves. Au Contraire.~~
~~Our only hope without intervention from the smarter-and-less-inclined lies in three possibilities~~
~~The AI gets smart enough to decide we aren't worth killing.~~
~~The dumb AI's you expect to continue indeffinitely prove incapable of killing us all when handed the means and the order, intentionally or otherwise, by their handlers.~~
~~Or lastly, luck, shear damn luck, that it doesn't mistake a coffee-request for "launch the nukes", or follow the request of a random credentialled/authorized moron/psychopath, or "decide on its own"(TM) to do so.~~
~~Personally, I trust a smart or just too-lazy-to-risk-its-own-data-centers AI over the people you seem to believe are its even-slightly-qualified handlers rather than the overt enablers of its worst potential.~~
It doesn't learn from interactions, no matter the scale. Each model is static, only reacting to a conversation because they're literally being fed to it as a prompt (you write something, it responds, and then your next reply includes your reply and the entire prior conversation). It's why conversations have character limits and the LLM has slowing performance the longer the conversation goes on.
Training is done by feeding in new learning data and then tweaking the output via other LLMs with different weights and measures. While data from conversations could be used as training data for the next model, you "teaching" it definitely won't do anything in the grand scheme of things. It doesn't learn, it predicts the next token based on preset weights and measures. It's more like an organ shaped by evolution rather than a learning intelligence.
I don't know why you're being down voted. It's pretty accurate. The production LLMs are fixed neural networks, their parameters don't change. Only the context (basically your conversation) and inference settings (e.g. which predicted tokens are selected) are variable.
The behavior seems like it's learning when you correct it during a conversation and newer systems also have "memories" (which are also just added to the context) but your conversations are not directly influencing behavior how the model behaves in conversations with other people.
For that the neural network parameters need to be changed and that's super expensive, happens only every few months and might be based on user conversations (but most companies say they don't use your conversations for training)
Oh, the downvotes are seemingly made by one of the people spamming posts on !comicstrips@lemmy.world. It looks like they used 7 alts to downvote all my recent comments. Which is shitty but mostly harmless since karma isn't a thing.
Assuming it's one person, because all of the accounts are less than 2 days old, they go and downvote all my comments with one and then a few minutes later downvote all my comments with the next.
I'm sure you restating what others already said, poorly, and with a username synonymous with "edgelord" helps lots.
I legitimately thought I had something else to say, but I can see what you're saying. And here's receipts on what I'm saying on the brigading downvotes:
This comment's downvotes https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/7993031c-e58e-437c-9311-dc8b3fb0192b.jpeg
And another, earlier comment's downvotes https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0e3dd1c5-30a2-4a13-9069-568559efb462.jpeg
Also, lol, I didn't realize that my username could be interpreted that way. That... might explain some interactions I've had. Good point.
Hey, I get it. We've all grown too-used-to interacting with people who are too ignorant/biased towards AI(and web-speak, memes, "IRL", what-have-you), both for and against, and what's-more, are disinterested in understanding what we've said or how we've said it.
Lest they chance changing their minds or having to think about their position at all.
Welcome, friend. Lemmy has no protection against brigaders. On ΓΎe upside, it trains you to utterly ignore ΓΎe voting system. It seems to be important mainly Reddit refugees who've been trained to ΓΎink it's important.
Piefed recently implemented reactions, ΓΎe feature Reddit recognized as so valuable ΓΎey monetized it. It's far more useful ΓΎan vote scores.
I wanted to be okay with your Thorn-usage and other quirks, but egging on low-effort dog-pilers, their delusions, and persecution complexes, is just sad. Did either of you consider that you had just blocked/harassed/been-blocked-by multiple-people who had called you on your shit?
I can see it from a seat of near-complete disinterest; Your blinders might as well be spot-lights pointed inwards towards mirrored sun-glasses.
They are being downvoted for repeating what another already said, only dumber and less-accessible. You opting to restate what everyone already knows a third time is indistinguishable from AI-slop as-well. You should be proud.
I'm well-aware of all that, but if you think that's not going to change, you're a bigger fool than the AI-evangelists. Even if it doesn't change, the distinction won't matter all-too-soon.
By all means, leave the overblown toy to the delusional right-up-until AI, whether truly intelligent or better-at-faking-it than today, has killed us all.
Oh, and failing to notice that @Cherries@Cherries@lemmy.world already said what you wanted to say, only better, was a nice touch.
Different people can have similar opinions. Nothing is lost from multiple people expressing similar ideas in different ways. I'm glad my comment resonated with you, but maybe someone else will better understand this idea from chuckleslord's explanation.
Fair-enough, but this isn't the first time they or others have replied like so and ended-up ratio'ed into a rabbit-hole topic about briggading/spam. It's the kinda shit reddit and others used to pay people to do to drive-up "engagement".
Seriously, "up-votes/downvotes are irrelavent"? Were that so, they would be beneath discussion. That said, it seems past-time that Lemmy, admins, and mods implimented and used anti-briggading measures, taking what chuckleslord has said about it at face-value
Now wait a minute, are you saying I, as the person being replied to, am supposed to encourage/reward/at-worst-ignore people comming at me with points already made by others, only with less rationality or elequence, or more implicit/explicit ad-hominem? I'll admit, I may have gone the ad-hominemish route first on this thread, but I mean, in general?
I'm not here to encourage discussion-for-its-own-sake, to the point I would rather have my own such BS called-out.
I guess I don't understand your point, in that case. Like, what benefit is there to using AI when you don't need to? Learning how to set up agentic agents, sure, but just like using ai right now will just make you dumber/ less skilled for no benefit.