this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
724 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

76765 readers
2883 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Punchable face.

Also, Butlerian Jihad When?

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It is sad and mystically abysmally ironic that all the books written about dystopias are seemingly being read as manuals

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 3 days ago

"now if you just sign here to buy our Stasi-Bot..."

[–] Jumpropegazing@lemmy.zip 17 points 4 days ago

i wish i could palantir my nuts on his face

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

You're not going to beat the Chinese government by being worse than them. You beat them by helping the Chinese figure out the Chinese Government is bad. By being worse than them you just set yourself up to be destroyed the same way they will be.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago (23 children)

The whole reason China winning would be bad is because of their surveillance state ensuring no one gets around their curtailment of civil liberties...

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Any ways to actively help China win the AI race?

Hypothetically, of course.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Other countries are doing it to themselves, no need to do anything explicitly.

I mean, look at the shit hole that is the U.S. now. They are u doing themselves just fine and giving victories to their adversaries.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

anything is preferable to people like you

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

We are going in that direction. Data centers being built all over the place is the very foundation for tracking every human on the planet.

I think future generations will not have any ability to go online, shop, work or live without a real id tracking everything about them.

You voice your concerns about something unpopular online, you may be blocked from taking a loan or work a job. Fear of stating your true opinion will be everywhere.

[–] audaxdreik@pawb.social 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It won't even be obvious to you it happened or what may have caused it. Some AI algorithm determines you are an un-citizen and checks a box. Rejections keep coming back as you slowly fall down the social ladder, or not so slowly at all, until you become the invisible poor and disappear altogether.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago

Some stupid ass logic

[–] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago

CEOs are getting too comfortable again. One needs to be pew-pewed in the streets to thin the herd and guarantee next year's harvest!

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 days ago

Spoken like a true surveillance-state shill.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 5 points 4 days ago

Alex Karp thinks people only care about one kind of surveillance. And he thinks he will alleviate our fears if he gives us a pinky promise not to surveil us in that one way.

That way is cheating.

He later brings this up again, saying that most surveillance technology isn’t determining, “Am I shagging too many people on the side and lying to my partner?” Your guess is as good as any as to what that’s all about.

Well, thanks for clearing that up, Alex. That was indeed my sole concern.

(The rest of the article is full of indecipherable quotes from Alex, which demonstrates you don't need to be smart to be rich.)

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 11 points 4 days ago

This guy is the maker of surveillance states.

[–] korendian@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago

Those are the only two options???

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean, from his perspective, having nothing to lose (besides his soul, ofc, but that's for silly people 🙄), of course!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 days ago

what an absolute piece of human turd. most likely stinks like shit around him, every time he opens his mouth.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Of course he does. But false dichotomy aside, China has a good chance "winning the AI race" anyway. Given their existing work, the investment they're doing in higher education, the additional internationally trained talent they get every year, and the industrial base that lets them make cheap energy and hardware, I think at the very least China has a decent chance to create equivalent tools at a lower price than whatever the US AI industry creates. If they come out with a competitive hardware and sell it at lower margins, along with free models as they already offer... I think a lot of firms and governments would opt for that instead of paying for NVIDIA and OpenAI.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›