this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
1563 points (95.4% liked)

Political Memes

11736 readers
1322 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago (10 children)

But if we vote for the non-vegan ice cream place, we're telling the leadership that we're okay with non-vegan options and no progress will ever be made!

/s for the illiterate

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] KingCake_Baby@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What everyone forgets is that the actual voting already happened. The bus company, Cliff driving Committee, voted before the bus embarked. They voted for the bus driver to drive off the cliff to cut spending to maintenance and health insurance to the driver and bus. There only so much the riders can say at that point

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The only option the riders have to not drive off the cliff is to take control of the bus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Trying to reach the "I don't do politics" crowd with "harm reduction" doesn't really work as a strategy.

Like, they're already admitting that when something is an unappealing and controversial, they'd rather check out than engage. Going on to explain the gritty strategy for approaching unappealing and controversial politics is just adding more reasons onto the "I don't do politics" pile.

It's a crass comparison, but it would be like if someone said "I don't play MOBAs" and the response was to immediately launch into an explanation of League's current meta-strategy. Don't be surprised when they immediately check out of the conversation. (Yes I know games are frivolous and politics is life and death -- but the people who "don't do politics" don't see it that way)

More than that, nearly all of the "I don't do politics" people are almost certainly never going to see this image. We're in an online forum dedicated to talking about politics. The only people who see this are the people who already choose to spend their personal time on the subject. So ask yourself, is this image really about the people who are checked out of politics? Because, practically (regardless of intent) all this really seems to be is a thought-terminating cliche to throw at anyone who points out that running a "We're the lesser evil candidate!" doesn't actually engage or activate anyone who's already checked out!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] trillnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 10 months ago

im sure the illogical thinkers will start thinking logically any day now

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (7 children)

The problem with this is that the choice isn't cliff or ice cream. The choice is the cliff in front of us or the cliff around the corner.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] wpb@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The "drive off the cliff" party vs the "drive off the cliff, but ever so slightly slower and also we'll wave some rainbow flags I guess" party. I know who I'm voting for!

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

Also, I'm installing a bigger motor so you have a reason not to vote for the other party, because they'd get to go even faster

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

20 people voted to drive over the cliff. 30 people voted to fucking gun it and send that shit straight into the abyss. 1 person voted for ice cream but the cliff voters beat him to death. 50 people didn’t vote

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] csverdad@midwest.social 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah fuck that. We’re throwing the cliff people off the cliff. Y’all can keep playing these stupid games.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Yeah fuck that. We’re throwing the cliff people off the cliff.

Any minute now.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 6 points 9 months ago (5 children)

If "harm" and "less harm" are the only two options, then the only question is how quickly you die. There's the argument that we have to do "harm reduction" in order to buy time to organize for something better, but we've been procrastinating for decades apparently. Since all of history informs us that humans act only when inaction is no longer tenable (and sometimes not even then), really the only material difference between "harm reduction" and accelerationism is, again, the timeline.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Yeah.... But also, Carlin was right saying this shit is all a stage. We've got groups of bullies picking on us, and I'd rather throw bricks than help them decide who to pick on next.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (23 children)

I just knew the comments were going to be us tearing each other apart.

I'm just thinking out loud here. What if Progressives that are registered as Democrats changed their registration to independent? Also, stop sending them your money. We could organize it to happen over one week. Then keep it that way for 30 days. See how much power we truly have. If we can show the Democratic party that they would never win another election without us, maybe they would be more likely to listen.

We have to be careful though, I know this President is running roughshod over the Constitution with the blessing of SCOTUS and Congress but they don't have enough votes or State legislatures to amend the Constitution. If they get that, then that truly is the end of this experiment.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›