this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
371 points (94.7% liked)

Open Source

32415 readers
709 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Article: https://proton.me/blog/deepseek

Calls it "Deepsneak", failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers - unlike most of the competing SOTA AIs.

I can't speak for Proton, but the last couple weeks are showing some very clear biases coming out.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 27 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago
[–] JOMusic@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago

Well you just made me choke on my laughter. Well done, well done.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 19 points 3 days ago (6 children)

How is this Open Source? The official repository https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1 contains images only, a PDF file, and links to download the model. I don't see any code. What exactly is Open Source here? And if so, where to get the source code?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

To be fair its correct but it's poor writing to skip the self hosted component. These articles target the company not the model.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

he's probably right. the company wants to be disruptive, and it's normal for any company to steal data. you can self host the current model, but that doesn't mean this will always be the case. certainly they will want to make a profit at some point. it's day 1 silicon valley shit

[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There are many llms you can use offline

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago

Deepseek works reasonably well, even at cpu only in ollama. I ran the 7b and 1.5b models and it wasn't awful. 7b slowed down as the convo went on, but the 1.5b model felt pretty passable while I was playing with it

[–] zante@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 days ago

Proton have been too noisy from the very start .

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 3 days ago (5 children)

It might be that they're equating the name with the app and company, not the open source model, based on one of the first lines:

AI chat apps like ChatGPT collect user data, filter responses, and make content moderation decisions that are not always transparent.

Emphasis mine. The rest of the article reads the same way.

Most people aren't privacy-conscious enough to care who gets what data and who's building the binaries and web apps, so sounding the alarm is appropriate for people who barely know the difference between AI and AGI.

I get that people are mad at Proton right now (anyone have a link? I'm behind on the recent stuff), but we should ensure we get mad at things that are real, not invent imaginary ones based on contrived contexts.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Here is a general write up about the CEO showing their maga colors.

More happened in the reddit thread though that added some more elements, like the ceo opting for a new user name with "88" in it (a common right wing reference), his unprompted use of the phrase "didnt mean to trigger you," him evasively refusing to clarify what his stance actually was because "that would be more politics," on and on. You can read through that thread here, although proton corporate are mods, so i have no idea what they may have deleted at this point.

The thread was full of "mask on" behavior that is pretty transparent to anyone experienced with the alt right on the internet.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JOMusic@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago

Yeah it's a fair call, but to me it is the very context of why people are made at Proton that makes me suspicious of articles like this.

I can't find the original summary post someone made, but here's the last response from Proton CEO. Read the comments as well to get a good summary: https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/1i2nz9v/on_politics_and_proton_a_message_from_andy/

TL;DR: Proton used their official accounts to share CEO's pro-US-Republican thoughts as their official stance. They since apologized and said they would use personal account to share those thoughts. But (IMO) now having posted this blog on the actual Proton website, it says to me that there are some serious bias alignment issues with a company that is supposed to be a safe-haven away from all of that.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›