139

Paywall, but The Times helped the investigation, so not unreasonable.

Gist is: Sugar tried to claim he was non-dom, to save £186m in tax. However, members of HoL are officially classed as residents (because Jesus, imagine someone deciding on the laws of the country while not even officially living there)

Additionally, he's quoted in the article saying that if he was aware, he would have stepped down...So his HoL membership is now being reviewed on the grounds that he was ready to drop his duties the moment it was convenient to him.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] scratchee@feddit.uk 35 points 1 year ago

Fire the idiot, he clearly isn’t suitable for making decisions

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Lord Sugar sounds like the villain in a Willy Wonka movie…

[-] Flyberius@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

It's all take take take...

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago

Remind me why he was made a Lord?

[-] jon 15 points 1 year ago

He was one of the largest donors to the Labour Party, who made him a Lord. A few years later he switched sides to the Conservatives, and had been acting like the archetypal Tory gobshite ever since.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah? What made him switch? Was he all right before becoming a Tory?

[-] jon 13 points 1 year ago

Based on how he's been acting since he became a lord, i would guess that his donations to Labour were simply to secure him the life peerage that Labour duly gave him in 2009, and since then we're seeing his true colours, including reposting a photoshopped photo of Corbyn with Hitler, and mocking the Senegal football team, saying they looked like street-side hawkers. Í think he occasionally bleats some sexist crap on xwitter as well.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

I knew he was a cunt from the telly but he sounds like a proper cunt.

[-] lemmington_steele@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Labour back then were all into their 'Third Way' ideology (read 'neoliberalism with a left-wing mask') so it's not all unlikely he barely shifted his views at all

[-] FatLegTed@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

He's a chavvy spiv.

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

TBF he is not the only one who does this. Monaco exists purely for tax avoidance purposes. I have known many who have worked in Saudi and the likes. They have spent money on holidays rather than come back to the UK precisely for this purpose. I think the thing that is galling people the most is the sum of money. If he drops his Lords status then he would well be doing this in the future and no one can say a word.

The USA has a system where you pay tax no matter where you are in the world. Do you think people should be allowed to avoid tax if they are not in this country?

[-] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

If I remember correctly too, the "travel days" don't count. Might have changed recently, as it was a law written for steamships, not private jets.

So someone could arrive on the first Monday flight, be there for Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, fly back Thursday evening.

Technically only two days in the uk, so they could be around for the bulk of 45 weeks, and still be non-dom.

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

There is a lot of obfuscation going on with tax systems. This is by design so that only those with money can take advantage of it. Crickhowell showing just this.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
139 points (98.6% liked)

UK Politics

3145 readers
91 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS