148

Some backend libraries let you write SQL queries as they are and deliver them to the database. They still handle making the connection, pooling, etc.

ORMs introduce a different API for making SQL queries, with the aim to make it easier. But I find them always subpar to SQL, and often times they miss advanced features (and sometimes not even those advanced).

It also means every time I use a ORM, I have to learn this ORM's API.

SQL is already a high level language abstracting inner workings of the database. So I find the promise of ease of use not to beat SQL. And I don't like abstracting an already high level abstraction.

Alright, I admit, there are a few advantages:

  • if I don't know SQL and don't plan on learning it, it is easier to learn a ORM
  • if I want better out of the box syntax highlighting (as SQL queries may be interpreted as pure strings)
  • if I want to use structures similar to my programming language (classes, functions, etc).

But ultimately I find these benefits far outweighed by the benefits of pure sql.

(page 2) 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tun@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In my experience. ORM has its limitations.

You can only depend on ORM upto a point. Beyond that you have to go use Arel (relationship algebra in Ruby), execute prepared SQL statement, trigger and functions.

I use ORM for concise, easier to read and maintainable code. e.g. joining three or more tables in SQL is cumbersum and verbose. Writing related multiple query is too time consuming, etc.

I learnt from relational algebra, SQL, ORM to vendor specific SQL.

[-] thequickben@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I don’t like traditional ORM’s but I really enjoy using jooq. Statically typed queries are great with this library.

[-] koreth@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

jOOQ is really the best of both worlds. Just enough of an ORM to make trivial CRUD operations trivial, but for anything beyond that, the full expressive power of SQL with added compile-time type safety.

And it's maintained by a super helpful project lead, too.

[-] Cryan24@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Dapper.net is the right balance imo.. you get the shape the query and get object field mapping.

[-] didibear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Many-to-many associations are a pain to manage without an ORM.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
148 points (94.0% liked)

Programming

17314 readers
71 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS