111
Samsung’s $1,300 phone might someday have fees for AI usage
(arstechnica.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
111 points (98.3% liked)
Technology
59081 readers
3167 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Up until the S9, I considered the Galaxy series of phones to be basically worth their weight in gold, as they were the one holdout with things like headphone jacks and expandable storage. Sure, they preloaded cloud crap, but they were throwing everything at the wall at once.
From the S20 onward, they were the lesser evil, having abandoned those things, and seeming to charge more for extra storage with each generation. But they were still smooth, their camera still put out pictures that impressed me, and using Gboard didn't result in the swipe jitter I'd always experience on a comparable Pixel device.
Sounds like when my S23 dies, I'll be shopping around more seriously. AI is not a feature. The cloud is not a feature. It's an anti-feature, giving the manufacturer the ability to alter your bargain with them at any time, with the only limit being the law.
Same. Pixel + GrapheneOS sounds like the move for most now.
I still wish there was a Pixel phone with the kind of camera (software) you would get on a Samsung, and have a keyboard that doesn't act like your finger is jittering all over the place. Seriously, I don't know how Samsung pulled this off with a Google product, but somehow Google has not.
Maybe with the next Pixel.
Or maybe I should look into Sony phones, which are almost never talked about, but still have that beloved SD card and headphone jack.
What’s the issue with the Pixel cameras? I thought they were typically one of the selling points of the phone? Maybe I haven’t paid enough attention to recent reviews (been on iOS for a few years now, but want to switch back to Android).
You can install the pixel camera on graphene and it functions exactly the same as the stock OS
Because Google doesn't have root access to your phone. You can install the pixel camera but give it no network permissions. It's just another camera app at that point