this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
2 points (60.0% liked)

collapse

426 readers
6 users here now

Placeholder for time being, moving from lemm.ee

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Malthus didn't put up a particular date for his prediction.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

I don't understand what you're saying, then.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

I am saying one cannot speak seriously about how technological advances will drive immiseration by overpopulation while being a completely integrated part of the most technological and most genocidal civilization on the planet. There is no way for it to be an objective sober analysis of systems because it is inherently a narrative that will be used by that system to continue its centuries-long genocidal program.

It would be like saying that measuring the volume of skulls and correlating it with intelligence is just sober objective biological analysis in the middle of the transatlantic slave trade. Which is among the things we were doing and saying in the sciences during that time.

This can essentially only be responsibly analyzed and communicated by and with the global subaltern as part of their program of resistance and liberation. It can never be a part of the administration and maintenance of empire because it will always lead to the same fascistic outcome regardless of intent.

First we must end the greatest source of human suffering in the world - genocidal white supremacist capitalist patriarchy, responsible for a nearly million deaths of deprivation per year through trade policy alone, and the constant instigator of the overwhelming majority of kinetic conflict - and THEN we can talk about how the liberated people can choose to assess and adapt to carrying ecosystem capacity limits.

[–] Anarchitect@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

If you had to rewrite that as would you be able to?

Claim: The main thesis or assertion you want the audience to accept. It answers the question: "What is the point I am trying to prove?".

Evidence / Grounds / Data: The foundation of hard facts, statistics, or primary source material that supports the claim. It answers the question: "What factual information do I have to go on?".

Warrant / Reasoning: The logical bridge or unspoken assumption that explains how and why the evidence directly leads to the claim. It answers the question: "How does this data connect to and prove my thesis?".

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I found it easy enough to read

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)