Europe

Animal husbandry doesn't require fossil fuels. We've only been doing it for tens of thousands of years before fossil fuels were ever extracted or used. Separation achieved and it was easy.

Livestock is typically kept on marginal land that's unsuitable for most crops. If you manage livestock correctly you don't need to feed them anything, they'll go find their own food. If you're really smart you put them to work for you. This is something they call permaculture. Or regenerative farming.

No, again. If you know what you're doing then you are not going to be poisoning the groundwater.

Global warming is almost entirely due to fossil fuel usage. Again we were raising animals tens of thousands of years without any global warming. When did global warming start happening? When we started burning fossil fuels. Do you not understand this? Do you disagree?

And again tens of thousands of years we raised animals and (excessive) greenhouse gas emissions were not a problem. That started happening when we started burning fossil fuels. You seriously don't get this? Do you work for big oil or something? You can't be serious...?

I'm not sure what you don't understand? Is it the water cycle? Nitrogen cycles? Carbon cycles? Methane cycles? The difference between extracting things that were sequestered for hundreds of millions of years? Versus not doing that?!

Again, for tens of thousands of years all animals on Earth ate only what was on the surface of Earth. Fertilized with what's only on surface of the Earth. Whatever gases they burped out or farted or whatever.... They went into the atmosphere for a short while. Methane will react with hydroxyl radicals and turn into CO2 and water vapor over time(within a decade.) Which is plant food! Thus completing the cycle! Plants don't want Brawndo. They want to dig their roots into organic matter that's been broken down into rich soil, and they want some water and they want to inhale CO2 and exhale oxygen while enjoying a sun bath. Thus photosynthesis. Surely you follow?

Their pees and poops didn't accumulate because we didn't concentrate them in feed lots. Instead they'd walk around and they would spread that wonderful fertilizer without the human having to do any of that work themselves(and it is hard work). That's because we were good shepherds. We aren't good shepherds anymore... And for some of us I guess we forgot or we never knew any better. But that's a pretty shitty excuse because we have libraries and the internet and ultimately humanity does know better. It's just not as easy. It's not as convenient. It's not as exploitable in terms of capitaHELLism.

That's the problem with the world these days. You can't beat mother nature at her own game. But somehow you think you can?

So what's your solution to deal with all the livestock? Eating them is not the problem. Them existing would be the problem. So I guess your solution is to kill them all? Should they go fully extinct or do you want to keep a few around to put in a zoo?

When you dig up the sequestered remains of plants and animals that have died and accumulated over hundreds of millions of years and then we take that and then we burn about 100 million barrels of oil every single God damn day.... That was previously sequestered deep in mother Earth for hundreds of millions of years.... That's a 'cycle' that's going to take hundreds of millions of years to correct, potentially. That's a really really really really big problem.... Conservation of matter and energy, and all.