1215
One job is important to the prosperity and safety of our future. The other can disappear tomorrow and nothing would change
(discuss.online)
this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
1215 points (99.3% liked)
Work Reform
16358 readers
37 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not that I disagree with the point generally, but there is a difference of scale here.
There are around 22k ICE agents. At 150k, that's 3.3b for the first year, and then 2.2b in following years.
There are around 4m teachers in the US. To raise them all from 55k to the 100k that ICE agents make (ignoring the hiring bonus) would cost 180b/yr. Two orders of magnitude greater.
I'm not saying it's not worth it. I'm also not saying that ICE agents are good. I'm also not saying this disparity is justified.
I'm simply saying that the analogy, as given, implies that if we had the money to pay ICE agents 100k+bonuses, then we should have just paid the teachers that much instead. But that's not how the math works. And just because the argument feels good emotionally doesn't mean it's accurate. And the truth shouldn't need a lie to drive it forward. There are plenty of good, factual arguments to make, and this isn't one of them.
To be fair, there are plenty other jobs thst could be cut, like CEO of Amazon
Every corporate CEO should be cut... with a guillotine
You are a visionary @Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
Note that the CEO's also don't go very far for teacher pay. It looks like a few hundred CEO's cut would raise teachers yearly pay by ~$100/month. Same mistake: 4 million is a big number to divide by.
How about all the money made by health insurance companies that shouldn't exist? That'd go a long way toward funding education.
If we believe the internet, all of that is funneled to the CEOs, and so the previous post applies?
(Which seems absurd to me, but maybe the bills are rare enough that this makes sense? Does anybody have data on how big that figure is vs actual cost of the buildings+labor+materials? We could compare to other countries, but then I think we're seeing a difference in infrastructure, social and physical, more than malfeasance.)
While I'm sure there's a not-insignificant amount of government grants that go towards CEO pay... they're not paid directly by the government. That's an even worse comparison.
A failure to tax them is one remove away from direct payment.