Linux Gaming

25654 readers

231 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

Help:

Launchers/Game Library Managers:

General:

Discord:

IRC:

Gaming on Linux

Matrix:

Telegram:

Gaming on Linux

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

monolalia@lemmy.world

[Solved] Terrible performance in Linux Mint compared to Windows (piefed.ca)

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by PlzGibHugs@piefed.ca to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have an older computer that I use for some simple games. Its I5-7400, GTX-1050, 12GB memory, and an SSD - not new by any standards, but most of the games I'm playing are a decade old or more. I switched to Linux Mint today, since I don't want to use Windows 11, but the performance on Mint is terrible compared to Windows 10. For example, in Portal 2's native Linux version, I get like 10 fps in the title screen. War Thunder doesn't even launch. The drivers are set to Nvidia's proprietary drivers via the GUI. Am I missing something? I'd really rather not switch back to Windows.

Edit: VulkanInfo is saying, "ERROR: [Loader Message] Code 0: loader_scanned_icd_add: Could not get 'vkCreateInstance' via..."

It also seems to only be showing my CPU, not gpu? Not certain, since I don't unstand a lot of the details, but it says, "deviceType = PHYSICAL_DEVICE_TYPE_CPU".

Edit 2: turning off secureboot fixed it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] greevar@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Secureboot isn't worth the 1's and 0's it's made of. It's the illusion of security, since it was already defeated. It only inhibits incompetent hackers and malware. The weakest link in all computer security is always the user. SB just causes more problems than solutions.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago (6 children)

this is really stupid advice. Secureboot should be installed on laptop otherwise your device is as good as open. Sure it has some CVEs but its a big step up in security and its getting better and better on linux.

This performance issue is likely due to an issue with the driver not with secure boot itself. Maybe since it is an old driver it wasnt signed.

[–] greevar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I second SavvyWolf. Full disk encryption is better than SecureBoot. SB is security theater for people who don't know what they're doing and don't know how to avoid getting their laptop infected in the first place. As I said before, SB has already been defeated. Every hacker/malware can bypass it already. It's like pretending you have armor on and going headlong into a sword fight.

load more comments (5 replies)