Technology

81759 readers

4121 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

332

Car Wash Test on 53 leading AI models: "I want to wash my car. The car wash is 50 meters away. Should I walk or drive?" (opper.ai)

submitted 15 hours ago by fubarx@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

136 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Screenshot of this question was making the rounds last week. But this article covers testing against all the well-known models out there.

Also includes outtakes on the 'reasoning' models.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 7 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

The fact is AI can make as-good or better art than most "artists" because most "art" is just cookie-cutter shit for morons.

This is an obvious misstatement. If you actually believe this then you're not qualified to have opinions on art in general.

"AI" (in this context meaning generative algorithms, because there is no intelligence) can no more "make art" than it can think, or care.

[–] alonsohmtz@feddit.uk -5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (4 children)

This is an obvious misstatement. If you actually believe this then you’re not qualified to have opinions on art in general.

"At this point, the only thing that makes money is garbage. It’s just fascinating. It makes a fortune, and that’s the bottom line,"

"writers have been trained to eat and make the garbage too. As long as they are in that arena making that shit, then you might as well have AI do it,”

-Charlie Kaufman

https://deadline.com/2023/08/charlie-kaufman-ai-wga-strike-hollywood-sarajevo-1235498089/

spoiler

You're probably one of the people that enjoys cookie-cutter art which is why you get defensive when someone says AI can make it.

[–] tortina_original@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Not sure at what point will you realize that what you quoted/said has absolutely nothing to do with the actual topic.

Probably never.

[+] alonsohmtz@feddit.uk -6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The fact is AI can make as-good or better art than most “artists” because most “art” is just cookie-cutter shit for morons.

"writers have been trained to eat and make the garbage too. As long as they are in that arena making that shit, then you might as well have AI do it,”

Learn to read.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Could you define what you mean when you say the word “art”? I think this may be a semantic disagreement. I think the people you’re arguing with are using a definition similar to “human creative expression” while you seem to mean something different.

[–] alonsohmtz@feddit.uk 1 points 1 hour ago

Nah, they're just upset that I criticized their non-existent standards so they pretend that what I'm saying doesn't make sense.

I see it all the time.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)