this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
11 points (92.3% liked)

Bluesky Social πŸ¦‹

234 readers
2 users here now

Bluesky is a federated social network built on ATProtocol.

Rules:

  1. Follow lemmy.zip's site-wide rules.
  2. All posts must, in some way, relate to Bluesky or ATProto.
  3. Do not make duplicate posts.
  4. Do not post x.com links.

Useful Links:

News, discussion, and memes are all allowed here.

See also:

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

In 2023, Bluesky's CTO Paul Frazee was asked what would happen if Bluesky ever turned against its users. His answer:

it would look something like this: bluesky has gone evil. there's a new alternative called freesky that people are rushing to. I'm switching to freesky

That's the same argument people made about Twitter. "If it goes bad, we'll just leave." We know how that played out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago (8 children)

I don't follow. What are you saying?

[–] finickydesert_1@social.vivaldi.net 2 points 2 months ago (7 children)

@Lumidaub @cm0002 i think it’s refrence to it is still centralized, so if bluesky won’t the way of twitter then the poster believes they are trapped. I mean there are alternatives within that protocol but there also is mastodon; also you could host the profile on your own server.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Accepting this thesis for a moment - okay, and? How does that mean I need to be "wary"?

[–] finickydesert_1@social.vivaldi.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

@Lumidaub : Don't put all your eggs in one basket. I could be wrong. *shrugs*, I'm currently on Mastodon, so I should be ok.

why is the poster posting that i'm lost as well

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

I mean, if your business somehow relies exclusively on BSky, sure, that's probably not a good idea. But that's true for any site that you use for engagement, no matter the underlying technology. I'm confused.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)