this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
860 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

82296 readers
4477 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
860
Tesla Robotaxis Reportedly Crashing at a Rate That's 4x Higher Than Humans (gizmodo.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
170 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Self-driving cars are often marketed as safer than human drivers, but new data suggests that may not always be the case.

Citing data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Electrek reports that Tesla disclosed five new crashes involving its robotaxi fleet in Austin. The new data raises concerns about how safe Tesla’s systems really are compared to the average driver.

The incidents included a collision with a fixed object at 17 miles per hour, a crash with a bus while the Tesla vehicle was stopped, a crash with a truck at four miles per hour, and two cases where Tesla vehicles backed into fixed objects at low speeds.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tomalley8342@lemmy.world 65 points 2 weeks ago (21 children)

Nah, that one's on Elon just being a stubborn bitch and thinking he knows better than everybody else (as usual).

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (19 children)

He's right in that if current AI models were genuinely intelligent in the way humans are then cameras would be enough to achieve at least human level driving skills. The problem of course is that AI models are not nearly at that level yet

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Cameras are inferior to human vision in many ways. Especially the ones used on Teslas.

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Lower dynamic range for one.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)