this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
21 points (92.0% liked)

Aviation

582 readers
1 users here now

Anything related to aircraft, airplanes, aviation and flying. Helicopters & rotorcraft, airships, balloons, paragliders, winged suits and anything that sustains you in the air is acceptable to post here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Under the initiative, either Singapore Changi Airport (SIN) or Seletar Airport (XSP) will be used as a testbed to co-develop what CAAS describes as a “comprehensive readiness framework” for integrating open-fan engines and next-generation aircraft into existing airport operations. The work will cover aircraft and engine design considerations, airport infrastructure modifications, changes to operational procedures, safety standards and regulatory processes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (6 children)

They're claiming 20% more fuel efficiency which would be huge, but at the expense of a metric fuck load of moving parts. Also who the fuck knows that happens if you have to make a gear up landing with these things

[–] AllzeitBereit@feddit.uk 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

How many more moving parts than a conventional turbofan? Maybe four gears and a rotor?

[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Uh all of those blades, including the fixed ones, are variable pitch. Every single blade has several precision moving parts

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 1 points 6 days ago

This thing looks like it has less moving paths than a normal turbofan... Look at cutouts of the CFM56, easily available online.

load more comments (3 replies)