this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
52 points (100.0% liked)

Pulse of Truth

2186 readers
37 users here now

Cyber Security news and links to cyber security stories that could make you go hmmm. The content is exactly as it is consumed through RSS feeds and wont be edited (except for the occasional encoding errors).

This community is automagically fed by an instance of Dittybopper.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Italy fines Cloudflare 14M euros for not blocking pirate sites on 1.1.1.1 DNS service.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

It’s irritating that this is mentioned in the same breath as banning X’s child porn bot.

Piracy isn’t on the same plane.

I am curious what latency a blocklist would incur. Anecdotally, pihole is faster with a block than a lookup even if it’s cached, but how that scales to cloudflare’s scale, I don’t know.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Generally with these things (1.1.1.1), (8.8.8.8),(9.9.9.9) they multicast the IP so it resolves to about the closest one. Each "one" being its own recursive resolver.

In fact: it'd be cool to show instead. If someone from the western hemisphere and eastern both ping 1.1.1.1, they'll get response times that are smaller than the delay from NY to London.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I suspect that @CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de wasn't referring to network latency caused by geographical distance, but instead to response delay caused by increased processing time due to additional complexity.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 weeks ago

Correct. Reading is hard I guess.