this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
486 points (99.0% liked)
Art
541 readers
244 users here now
THE Lemmy community for visual arts. Paintings, sculptures, photography, architecture are all welcome amongst others.
Rules:
- Follow instance rules.
- When possible, mention artist and title.
- AI posts must be tagged as such.
- Original works are absolutely welcome. Oc tag would be appreciated.
- Conversations about the arts are just as welcome.
- Posts must be fine arts and not furry drawings and fan art.
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Metal rebar reinforced supports inside it.
No.
A. It was made 1890ish
B. Rebar rusts even if totally encased which would split the marble from within. (Marble is porous anyway so total encasement isn't super easy anyway.)
C. It isn't needed, Bernini was doing more with less before the advent of rebar.
Circa 1682:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_and_Daphne_(Bernini)#/media/File:Apollo_and_Daphne_(Bernini)_(cropped).jpg
Artists were using metal bars inside marble statutes for joining and shaping for centuries. But I’m not going to argue about it as this is lemmy and opposing facts are not wanted here.
Yes ai is always correct. This is true, just for much larger statues like David though iirc it has no support either just a hole in the base to connect it to the roof it was intended to be on.
That said no there is no rebar, no metal insert of any kind just fun optical illusion.