this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
413 points (96.2% liked)
Late Stage Capitalism
2491 readers
8 users here now
A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.
A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.
RULES:
1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.
2 No Trolling
3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.
4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.
5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.
6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
FDR was the leader at the time of the new deal. He gave into the will of the workers. This makes him left wing.
Sure. Left wing for a president, even the left wing of the ruling capitalist class. Not the left wing of the working class.
But you're absolutely right. He was the guy who did the thing at the time that was needed to do the thing. History isn't made by great men. It is made by workers. My point is he sided with the winners.
But he hadn't adopted the sensibilities and interests of the working class. It just so happened that a large enough section of the ruling class agreed with him at the time, not completely without his presidential influence, but that's the whole problem right? FDR was hardly the first member of the the ruling class who had won over to the side of workers, many great socialists, including Marx, Lenin, were themselves members of the bourgeoisie. But there is a canyon of difference between the guy who led a revolution in Russia, and the guy who stopped one in america.
As far as presidents go, he's not a slave owning mass murder, pedophile, complete nepo-baby, etc., the man wasn't evil as far as presidents go, but he was only evef momentarily and conditionally on the side of workers. Populism isnt necessarily leftism
You're doing literally everything in your power to not recognise this guy as left wing to the point of absurdity. It doesn't have to be any more complicated than: sides with workers, left wing. Sides against workers, right wing. Being left wing isn't some special club that only you and all the people you like can join. It's a broad political stance largely defined by the politics of the time. There are plenty of terrible leftists.
You keep calling elephants oranges and people are telling you that you are wrong and you keep saying you are right.
Read up on the Dunning-Kruger scale.
Why I know I'm an idiot, y'all are the ones arguing with me