this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
15 points (94.1% liked)

Chess

2213 readers
9 users here now

Play chess on-line

FIDE Rankings

September 2023

# Player Country Elo
1 Magnus Carlsen ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด 2839
2 Fabiano Caruana ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 2786
3 Hikaru Nakamura ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 2780
4 Ding Liren ๐Ÿ† ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ 2780
5 Alireza Firouzja ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 2777
6 Ian Nepomniachtchi ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ 2771
7 Anish Giri ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 2760
8 Gukesh D ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ 2758
9 Viswanathan Anand ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ 2754
10 Wesley So ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 2753

Tournaments

Speed Chess Championship 2023

September 4 - September 22

Check also

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This question was posed to me, and I was surprised that I could not find a solution (as I thought that all rook tours [open or closed] were possible). Starting from a8, could a rook visit every square on the board once, ending on f3?

I tried a few times, with a few different strategies, but I always ended up missing one square.

It's really easy to burn pairs of rows or columns, so the problem space could be reduced...

...but at some point (4x4), I was able to convince myself that it is impossible (at least at this size and state):

...but it might be possible that shaving off column or row pairs is also discarding a solution?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 days ago (6 children)

I may not be understanding you correctly. Can you elaborate? Feel free to use coordinates.

[โ€“] SwarmMazer@awful.systems 3 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I am afraid that I didnโ€™t apply any rigor here and thought I solved it. Been playing with it for a bit and see there is likely not a solution. Good fun for me.

[โ€“] SwarmMazer@awful.systems 1 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Seems this is related to Hamiltonian path problems. The issue is there is always one square that canโ€™t be picked up. Why could this be?

[โ€“] SwarmMazer@awful.systems 1 points 4 days ago

The 2x2 case is impossible, I suspect it is related in some way.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)