this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
154 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

4349 readers
84 users here now

Good memes, bad memes, unite towards a united front.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee -2 points 2 months ago (7 children)
[–] Barabas@hexbear.net 38 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Median numbers do look a lot better when you remove 60% of below median earning workers, who would have thought.

[–] King_Simp@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Where's this coming from? (I'm probably just blind, sorry)

[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

It's only that high if you narrow the scope to only full-time and employed for the whole year. This neglects how much (or maybe rather how little) the us values a large proportion of its labor. I didn't check the math on the percentage they gave, but it's at least in the right ballpark from some very rough napkin math- 60% of below median is 30% of total, and if we make a not amazing assumption that the "curve" of earnings is linear, then we can just shift the median by the given 30%, which if you shift up from 47960 you get 68.5k, or if you shift down from 60070 you get 42k.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)