89
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by spacedogroy@feddit.uk to c/gaming@beehaw.org

Should put this whole issue to rest (for a while, at least 😉).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hypx@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago

It’s less powerful than an Xbox One X. I think the problem is that they didn’t really think through what a console generational leap would actually consist of.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago

I think they thought through just how important hitting that price point was, because it's done very well for them.

[-] Hypx@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

PS5 outsold both versions combined by around 2x. I don't think it was nearly that big of a deal.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

And do you think that would have panned out better if the cheaper console option wasn't available? Not to mention it would only leave them with the console that shared a lot of the same components as the PS5 during supply shortages as well.

[-] Hypx@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

Microsoft should really ask themselves why they couldn't have procured more components, despite being one of the most profitable companies on Earth.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

I mean, unless their goal is to lose even more money on each console sold, I doubt they were interested in that. But that's not their goal. Their goal is to get people subscribed to Game Pass.

[-] any1th3r3@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

Yes, thank you!
Microsoft has historically never been profitably selling consoles, which is certainly part of their shift towards different business models, including Game Pass and a focus on more than just Xbox, but PC and Cloud as well. They don't really have much of a financial incentive to sell consoles for that sake alone, they have to get people to subscribe to Game Pass and/or buy games (possibly digitally whenever possible) and the Series S is their best console for that, as the consumer is very much locked in.

[-] Hypx@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Game Pass includes PC gamers. It's probably not that profitable either.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

Game Pass does include PC gamers, which is why they're probably more interested in opening up that service to more people with a cheap console SKU than to sell Xbox consoles, likely because outselling Sony by doing the same thing Sony is doing is a very steep hill to climb.

[-] Hypx@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Then why even bother with a console? Just define the minimally specced PC box needed for Game Pass and call it a day.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

One day they might. PC has taken a larger and larger market share as time has gone on. PCs became easier to game on, consoles became less streamlined, and perhaps even the closed-off nature of consoles compared to the open nature of PCs has played a role. But as of 2023, you're still not making a $300 PC that plays games as well as an S. While consoles have become less streamlined, they're still more streamlined than a PC.

[-] Hypx@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

We've already established that the $300 box is not viable for much longer. And since it sold around 1/3 the numbers of the PS5, it didn't even work as advertised.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

Did we establish that? Most of the biggest games are not the hardest on system requirements. And while Microsoft would obviously prefer that they sold more Xboxes and reached more Game Pass subscribers (the 25M-30M is impressive regardless), I'd be surprised if they expected the majority of those to be Series S; but they probably did recognize that that customer base is still worth reaching. We're just not at a point in the history of consoles where they all have the same business model anymore, like they did 20 years ago.

[-] Hypx@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

They compromised their higher end system with their lower end system. It's time to admit they made a mistake here, and they are only now starting to fix it.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

I've got a really hard time calling it a mistake when it's been more successful, but you do you.

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It’s less powerful than an Xbox One X

Lmao, bruh, no one who has played games on both would ever claim that. It has slightly more raw graphical compute power while having a drastically weaker CPU, slower SSD, slower memory, and slower overall throughput.

[-] Hypx@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

It has faster memory than the Series S. More importantly, it has more RAM. A few improvements here and there doesn't make the Series S a real next-gen console.

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

As someone who has a One X, a Series S, and a Series X, I can assure you that you have no idea what you're talking about.

The One X doesn't get used anymore and the Series S gets used ballpark more often than the series X. Pretty much all games play a very comparable experience on it compared to the series X, something that cannot be said about the One X.

[-] Carter@feddit.uk 2 points 10 months ago

It just isn't though.

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
89 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30223 readers
279 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS