[-] TJD@sh.itjust.works -1 points 7 months ago

This is just overwhelmingly false on just about every manner. Try getting your information from somewhere other than r/politics

[-] TJD@sh.itjust.works -1 points 7 months ago

That highly depends on the individual.

[-] TJD@sh.itjust.works -1 points 7 months ago

Just declaring that everyone you disagree with has no values doesn't make it so.

[-] TJD@sh.itjust.works -2 points 8 months ago

As a frequent user of pcsx2, what's the drama there?

[-] TJD@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 months ago

How do you square support for Israel as a state when it's merely an extension of British colonialism, and when Israel seems to actively seek to deny Palestinians any form of autonomy as a policy?

Asked and answered lol.

[-] TJD@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 months ago

far better place to live despite being incredibly low population density

I highly doubt that it's an incredibly low population density if you actually break it up and look at just the areas you're talking about rather than everything in the boundaries of what is considered the town. Because I highly doubt there's any decent amount of land attached to any of those homes, or open space between them. Just because it isn't dense compared to new york or something, doesn't mean it's incredibly low either.

It works there because the zoning and bylaws permit it

Also because there's enough people there. I spent a lot of my childhood in a town of ~2000-3000. Fuck half a dozen businesses on each street, there's barely even two streets with any amount of businesses on them, and one is just the intersection with a major interstate. And all that's equally without the government interfering. It's more practical to centralize what businesses there are along Main Street and just have people drive in to town when they need.

[-] TJD@sh.itjust.works -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Oh, my bad. It's not because you disagree with it, it's just that you happen to totally coincidentally line up with what you don't support only having support due to propaganda.

[-] TJD@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 months ago

Because surely the only reason someone could possibly disagree with you is propaganda.

[-] TJD@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 months ago

I mean yeah, I think those people are shit humans for what they're supporting, but are people seriously downvoting news because they don't like what's happening?

[-] TJD@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

To the people downvoting this, genuine question, what is it about this post that you felt merited a downvote?

[-] TJD@sh.itjust.works -2 points 8 months ago

I suppose I don't understand why they shouldn't be grouped together by the tool when firearms are common to each of those issues.

Traffic jams, double parking, and car bombs all make use of the same tool as well, but it would be asinine to put them all into the same bucket when they have entirely different causes.

Look at it this way, nobody is trying to put self harm via knife in the same category as some drug deal gone south involving a knife. So why is it reasonable to do the same when the tool is a gun? Both murder and suicide happen regardless of guns, and looking at statistics across places with more/less guns regarding murder, guns are an entirely irrelevant factor.

view more: next ›

TJD

joined 9 months ago