0
()
submitted a long while ago by @ to c/@
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TCB13@lemmy.world 89 points 11 months ago

Although we’ll be hosting the repository on GitHub

Why aren't they using a self-hosted instance of Gitea? This makes no sense move to Github of all places.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 55 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Could be familiarity? I saw an article go by recently about how projects that aren't on GitHub suffer from lack of contributions. Although that matters more for smaller projects, Mozilla is a beast and could probably pull people off GitHub if it wanted to.

Also if anyone should be trying to build up an alternative to GitHub, it should be Mozilla

[-] dinckelman@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

If you are at a skill level, where you can meaningfully contribute to a project like this, registering for an alternative git provider should not be an obstacle

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 35 points 11 months ago

Obstacle? No. Annoyance? Yes.

[-] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 17 points 11 months ago

I agree with this in a lot of cases, but I'm not sure about this case - Mozilla won't be accepting PRs over GitHub from what I can tell.

[-] antrosapien@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago

Git desperately needs something like activity pub. That's how it should have been from the beginning

[-] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

and it was lol. Git was designed to work using email and plain text patches. No nonsense, no closed platforms. You can still use git that way.

[-] andruid@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

It's super cool that it supports this, heck I've used it when no other options were there (and thank git I could! It made a nightmare into just a little more work instead).

I will say though, it's most of the other software forge features that people normally talk about adding Activity Pub support for (issues tracking, merge requests, tracking forks, CI tooling, handling documentation, etc).

[-] TCB13@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Maybe you can convince Gitea guys to work on that? After all they're the leading open-source alternative.

[-] deur@feddit.nl 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Lets just say it's coming... soon :)

[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago
[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 11 months ago

The J is lowercase, -ejo is an Esperanto suffix meaning "place".

[-] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 11 months ago

Agreed. They could've hosted nearly any git forge since they'll keep using bugzilla and other workflows as is.

[-] Gecko@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

They already use GitHub for a bunch of other projects. See https://github.com/mozilla/ and https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

It’s the most widely used platform that the most people are familiar with that they get to use likely for free. Newer projects of theirs are also hosted there. Why would you say it makes no sense?

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Hosting the public repo? I heard that the GH repo is just a mirror

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 0001
0 points (NaN% liked)

0 readers
0 users here now

founded a long while ago