zbyte64

joined 2 years ago
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 5 hours ago

Never thought I would see a Marxist-Lennist say America should have internment camps.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

“She’ll turn Karnes ICE Detention Center into a prison for American Zionists and former ICE officers for human trafficking,” Democratic candidate Maureen Galindo said on Instagram, referring to herself in the third person.

“It will also be a castration processing center for pedophiles, which will probably be most of the Zionists,” she said.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Wow, which mod here does not want her words to be repeated? Like sure I flubbed internment and concentration camp, but really?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems -1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

Ahh yes, the classic "it is the people who talk about racism that are racist".

And it's great how you gloss over the fact she is calling for due process to be withheld and carry out castrations.

And holy hell, you know she said something as unhinged as we need ~~concentration~~ internment camps and you seem to be okay with that

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 9 hours ago

If my opinion is of no consequence then let us both find a more meaningful endeavor

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 10 hours ago

Or we could hang them upside down and gut them: https://youtube.com/shorts/QMmkEf-qN7I

But I'm not picky, just saying we have options

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems -1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (7 children)

Here i thought it was the "put all the rich 'zionists' in a concentration camp and castrate them because they are likely pedophiles " that got her banned. Zionists is in quotes because she conflates that with Judiasm.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, that was my response as well. We had a literal violent coup and their decisive action was just stuck their thumbs up their ass.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Because the assurance was the basis for the treaty negotiations that followed. You can say that doesn't not justify aggression, and I would agree. But to say assurances have no bearing in the matter is materially false

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

I am flattered my opinion on Elon means so much to you, so I will throw you a bone. You left out some facts I consider important, like he had to go to court to be retroactively considered a founder. A person who values a good debate would address such common criticisms head on instead of pretending that is not a relevant fact to be addressed. I simply value a good debate and this is not it.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (5 children)

I am saying that when treaties and assurances are ignored you risk war. That is the case here.

Edit: here the receipts: https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2017-12-12/nato-expansion-what-gorbachev-heard-western-leaders-early

US secretary of state gave verbal assurances in 1990 that were abandoned later.

 

A critical and funny critique of an AI written song.

view more: next ›