394
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

With Moms for Liberty co-founder Bridget Ziegler embroiled in scandal, the group is now on the defensive—and that will hurt Republicans in this fall’s elections.

Moms for Liberty has fallen on hard times. Membership is dwindling in some precincts, and its school board candidates are on a losing streak. Co-founder Bridget Ziegler is embroiled in a sex scandal involving her husband, former Florida GOP Chair Christian Ziegler, and parents are running brutal ads attacking her. We chatted with journalist Jennifer Berkshire, the author of a forthcoming book on battles over education, who explains the bigger story here: The right is now on the defensive in the culture wars.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 144 points 3 months ago

What’s bad for MAGA is best for America.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 74 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I mean, I want to believe. But these pop-up shops have always been disposable. Moms for Liberty. Project Veritas. Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. They aren't built to last. Their staff will be recycled into the next astroturfed group, be it "Concerned Uncles Noticing Terrorists", "Freedom Advocate Rights Technicians", or "Grandmothers Overseeing All Temporary State Enforced Xenophobia".

And they'll get a dozen Op-Eds in your national news org of note, because Harlan Crow knows which Ombudsman needs a new RV.

[-] achance4cheese@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 months ago

That last one lol, G.O.A.T.S.E.X. Your creativity is wonderful!

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 70 points 3 months ago

And the rest of the world, more likely than not.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

It’s actually way more of a sure thing than that, Trump winning in November pretty much signs the death warrant for virtually any climate change mitigation initiative. And while nuclear war is a very real possibility either way it’s clearly lower under the least impulsive of the two options

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago

I think the US breaking its own oil production record was the death warrant.

[-] MossBear@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Very much more likely I dare say.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 61 points 3 months ago

Moms for Baby-rearing slavery? With the various Christian Evangelist Fundamentalist "wins" in the last few years, hopefully it gets clearer and clearer that these issues are increasingly difficult to de-couple from the current Republican Party.

[-] misspacfic@lemm.ee 21 points 3 months ago

the current republican party is full of christian nationalist money.

so, yeah, it may need to be destroyed and split into a "here's where you christians can spew out your domination propaganda" and "here's actual conservatism with room for compromise."

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 51 points 3 months ago

Or, as I like to refer to them: KarenPAC

[-] Youthless@lemm.ee 59 points 3 months ago
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 37 points 3 months ago

Klanned Karenhood, but yeah.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago
[-] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 3 points 3 months ago

What does the last K stand for?

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

Ku Klux Klanned Karenhood

There's an extra K in there because it's trendy. Ubisoft released the first AAAA game, so the white supremacists gotta one-up it.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Krusty's Komedy Klassics

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Kowtowing Klanned Karenhood

[-] Introversion@kbin.social 27 points 3 months ago
[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 22 points 3 months ago

Moms for Thievery, more like.

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 3 months ago

On my mobile device the headline in the list view was cut off like

Moms for Liberty Is Slowly Imploding, and That’s Bad

And I had a hard time understanding how that could be a bad thing.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

Maybe it's happening quickly enough that they aren't suffering very much?

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 3 months ago

I'm sure they'll take it like a champ.

[-] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 3 months ago

what is this? good news monday?

[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 19 points 3 months ago

Thoughts and prayers

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

Gosh I feel for them... if only they imploded quickly and dramatically... and maybe there could be a significant enough scandal that most of them could end up in prison.

That's the karma these fucks deserve.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 6 points 3 months ago

There's a small part of me that hopes this election will actually be less close than the media are portraying it to be, because they have a motive to keep people watching and less people will watch if they think it isn't close, and because their coverage suggests it'll be close this will hopefully ensure high turnout among anti-Trump voters.

Although the polling doesn't look great. (And I say this as someone who knows about confidence intervals, margins of error, and weighting)

[-] Postreader2814@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

I'm really surprised this many republicunts we're able to work this closely together for so long without eating each other sooner.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Klan Karenhood in the mud. That is good news.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

As if GOP voting relied on their existence.

[-] onewaymars@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

still waiting for the sauce sadge

this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
394 points (98.0% liked)

politics

17986 readers
2346 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS