this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2026
534 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

89310 readers
4059 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Whether there is evidence or not of surveillance via Starlink, does anyone believe that anything connected to the Internet does not have some ability for surveillance imbedded?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

What do you mean by this? If you mean "networks can always be listened on on" then sure. If you mean "all devices have a backdoor" then no.

[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A lot of "duh" comments indicating people didn't read... The headline could be better too but it doesn't excuse commenting without even engaging the post...

Also, even if it was what people think it is, it's important to have evidence and journalism highlighting that evidence.

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I read the post and it's still a "duh." Of course, other countries will exploit the systemic corruption in our system. It makes a lot of sense for governments in non-Starlink countries to target Starlink users on their territory because those are basically guaranteed to be spies or saboteurs. And yeah, ad targetting isn't exactly a new tactic. I just don't get how agents are not using uBlock Origin. Don't they get some basic computer security best practices course?

[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You could call anything a "duh" with that argument....

I will say, I've taken a TON of basic cyber security corporate run training events... NONE of them talk about using ad block hahahahah.

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, maybe i am a bit biased. And you should definitely tell them to add ad blocking and awareness of targeted and dragnet malvertising to their courses. Blocking ads should also increase productivity by reducing distractions and cognitive load when using the web.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

This is what Surprised_Pikachu.jpg was made for I Imagine.

[–] pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Obviously most of people in comments didn't read the article, so here is TLDR:

A shady Israeli company was found to be spreading scary zero-click spyware through targeted ads. Despite being banned from Google ad platform, they seem to simply change business entity from time to time and keep doing what they do. One of such attacks was targeted to people using StarLink, including in countries that restrict StarLink use. Attacks through targeted ads, not StarLink itself. Targeted ads are bad, StarLink users are target audience.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is what happens when you societally refuse to "pierce the corporate veil". The criminals actually performing the illegal activity wear articles of incorporation like a costume or disguise, then when they get busted, they throw that costume in a dumpster and get a new one.

I think we need Fred, Daphne, and Velma to find out who this criminal really is.

[–] jasoman@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well it is an Israli company. The call could be coming from inside the house.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

JINKIES, a clue!

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Despite being banned from Google ad platform

The most shocking news to me is that google banned something evil or malicious from their ad platform

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

It was the wrong kind of evil that doesn't make them any money and hurts sales.

[–] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz 145 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We should find the guy that made this and lock him up!

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de 68 points 3 days ago

I'm not arguing against your username, but this article is about an Israeli malware campaign using ad bids to specifically target itself towards Starlink users. There's nothing about Starlink itself being complicit.

I'd think if Starlink wanted to surveil their users (they probably do) they could find a more direct route than this (they probably have).

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For one mistake? Seems like that would be appropriate if he had a track record of bad behavior perhaps.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

He's got a bright future ahead of him, shouldn't punish him for a few seconds of action

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 92 points 3 days ago (2 children)

All ad networks are malware distribution networks.

Adblock is the new antivirus.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I heard adblock was sold to advertising interests, and some of the creators that were against selling it made the content blocker ublockorigin, which works better than adblock ever did. Undetectable by websites too unlike adblockers.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 54 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Adblock the concept, not Adblock the named software browser extension.

People should currently be using ublockorigin as you say.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

NOOOO YOU DON'T SAY

Noooooo. Ya don't say.

[–] ashenone@lemmy.ml 40 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm glad this is coming to light, but.. duh

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

People clapping for Internet on planes from Herr Tesla who led the massive data theft of social security and citizen records, and people would feign surprise?

As you said, duh

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

wasnt it obvious form the start? and since 2022, im not surprised its heavily rolled in RURAL area and red states.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Hey guys, I just heard water is wet. There's news all over. Why are we just picking on a musk owned company? Obviously Musk cares so little about his test subjects he also tallies what shows they watch and websites they visit, like Facebook. Every company under the sun is tapping your conversations, looking at your phone, listening to your music. Nothing you do is private, Starlink or otherwise.

Get VPN and even then its not so cut and dry.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Put musk in prison

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Is this why they want to use Starlink for mobile phone service and sell the infrastructure to telecoms?

Sell the service cheaply to telcos, hope they invest less in ground infrastructure and couple of decades later you can spy on every citizen.

[–] BuckFutter@timeyak.com 21 points 3 days ago

Ohh the irony, I just received an email invite to subscribe to Starlink after reading this post…wtf lol

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We need to nationalize Space X and Starlink, and imprison Musk.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

Alternatively, we could reinstate NASA's funding, and come up with an actually sane way to get Internet service to remote areas that doesn't involve what is essentially "space littering". Putting thousands of satellites into space for something that can be done way more practically on the ground makes every future thing you do in space harder, and severely hampers land-based astronomy. They have to track every nut and bolt in orbit for as long as they stay there, or one of those things will blow something to smithereens, even if it is small, like a literal nut or bolt.

We're letting private entities potentially trap our children here on Earth by failing to regulate and enforce what can be up there. If you envision a future with space colonies and exploration, SpaceX and Starlink are not how you get there. I'm sure its doing a great job letting yokels in the swamp watch foxnews.com though, so there's that.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] cloudshouter@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’m shocked, shocked I say!!

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You'll never guess the country who made and distributed the spyware ads...

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's China, right? I keep hearing about how China is the only country that ever spies ever. /s

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Discover-Tech, an Israeli advertising firm previously linked to the delivery of zero-click spyware, is the top bidder for Starlink ad impressions in 105 countries, according to a new report from Reuters.

Who could have seen this plot twist coming. Absolutely blindsided, that's me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

Kell soup reeze.

[–] stumu415@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

Utterly unexpected

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 days ago
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lol, but also, everyone should be using DNS over HTTPS.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 4 points 3 days ago

They could also location track you with really no way to hide that

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 days ago

whoodathunkit

load more comments
view more: next ›