this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2026
100 points (86.8% liked)

Technology

88823 readers
3717 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Calories, energy, and ammo.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I have 4 cans of beans. Im ready

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 8 hours ago

I have 20 Terry's chocolate oranges which I bought while drunk. I'm going to be a millionaire in the apocalypse wasteland.

[–] Creddit@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

The biggest mistake we made after the last financial crisis was not putting heads on pikes. Justice should be far more punishing if it's ever going to threaten white collar criminals.

I'm not holding my breath, but I hope current political extremism breeds actual consequences for the wealthy elite this time around.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 66 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

As a millennial, I've developed a baseline immunity to once in a lifetime devastating economic collapse.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I've never had any savings that can be influenced by a stockmarket crash, so I'll be fine

[–] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Seralth@piefed.seralth.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Never had more then a thousand dollars in savings before a medical emergency, major crisis, economic implosion, or some other event destroyed anything I built.

I just gave up entirely. Lot of people stuck in this position unfortunately

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago
[–] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Gen X here - we had a good quiet 20 years and then everything went entirely to hell.

[–] bashibazouk@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The official Gen X response is: whatever...

[–] KC_Royalz@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

Usually but I have a 12 year old daughter. If I didn't i would say let the world burn

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 6 hours ago

What timezone are you in?

[–] zangwill@lemmy.zip 48 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

AI stays: Wealth consolidation
Bubble bursts: Wealth consolidation
You are fucked either way

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 32 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Tanking the financial system by means of the AI bubble bursting, right?

[–] lividweasel@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

“Whoops, our AI agent went rogue and took all your money.”

[–] rhymeswithduck@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Would FDIC apply in this scenario? It should, since it's effectively bank robbing, but my guess is they'll have some excuse for why your money isn't insured specifically for AI agent theft.

[–] trojanbark@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

"Only humans can commit theft" probably

[–] eicker@lemmy.world 26 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

An AI CEO advising people to stock cash, food and a hand crank radio in case AI takes down banking is some spectacular product marketing. Silicon Valley spent years insisting AI would run everything. Now the contingency plan is to make sure nothing you own needs a computer. Progress! 😳

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 5 points 17 hours ago

imagine this kind of product marketing in 90s or something. "Hey everyone! We made something that is really really bad and dangerous (but also oh so very potent!!), it will end the world as we know it in a bad way just any day now! Look out, there it potentially goes! Soon we will be out of electricity and food, banks will collapse and nukes will fly! Isnt our product wonderful!!!"

Not only has the other shoe dropped for the world, entire warddrobe got thrown out as well.

[–] nullPointer@programming.dev 10 points 20 hours ago

plus, if the financial system collapses the cash won't be worth the paper it's printed on.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 21 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Still blaming AI for everything they do themselves I see.

[–] Seralth@piefed.seralth.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Don't worry everyone else does as well for some fucking reason it's not just the ceos.

[–] 100@fedia.io 6 points 18 hours ago

AI does not do anything by itself - it only does whats instructed

[–] 7112@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

This. So much this

[–] ElGrande@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

No way AI is taking down the financial system.

It's all fearmongering and doomerism.

[–] CluelessCalls@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

AI won’t, but the entities responsible for it will.

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 1 points 37 minutes ago

Ahem, you’re not talking to me, you’re talking to little Claudie.

[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

They will try and pass the fallout onto the people, similarly to how they did in 2008, with the mortgages being used to hedge their stock market bets (bad ones at that) after regulations were removed to safeguard that from happening and people lost their homes, the banks got bailed out. The people responsible got no punishment. They do this same shit all the time. They shoot too high hoping it'll catch on, and if it doesn't they don't pay the price. This time, we need to stand with whomever wears the cost and make sure the richest are the ones who pay. The ones responsible for this. They all go under, or we take them down.

Eta, this article is bullshit tho

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 6 points 18 hours ago

Perhaps not AI itself and perhaps not the actual system, but if/when the bubble bursts it absolutely will do a lot of financial damage.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Over god sake this again.

They wouldn't do it if it was going to actually destroy the world. Even trillionaires need to live in the world unless they seriously think they're gonna build Elysium.

[–] cloudshouter@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They think that can buy their way out of the consequences, and they are right. Economic crashes will not functionally hurt those people and they won’t be affected by climate change other then having to buy a different set of houses. Also a couple of them are trying to build Elysium.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The people working on AI are definitely not going to be millionaires. I'm talking about the so called scientists, who claim to believe they are working on The Manhattan Project 2.0: Armageddon, yet still apparently stay.

So what's the story here they go home at the end of the day to their family and say today with a good day I think the world will be destroyed by the end of 2027 but hey ho, at least I've got a pay rise, just need to make sure to spend it before next August.

Give me a break. Anyone who is actually working on a project that they thought was going to destroy the world would stop working on it.

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 1 points 32 minutes ago (1 children)

You clearly have no idea how much ai engineers are paid, and even less of an idea how their stock options are priced.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 25 minutes ago

What are you talking about. The engineers the ground level folk that a developing this stuff yes they're paid highly but they're not millionaires by any stretch in the imagination. Building a system that will crash the entire economic system of the Earth is not beneficial to them.

[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 41 minutes ago

Show me a single source that has any proof of AI being economically viable.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 5 points 20 hours ago

Why would I stock up when the rich already did it for me?

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

How many times has it been the end of the world? When I was a kid, it was the Cold War, every day the newspapers had articles about how we were on the verge of nuclear war. Famine was another, there was not enough water for the crops. There was AIDS, we were all going to get ill and die of Kaposi's Sarcoma. There's got to be a list of these somewhere...

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 33 minutes ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago)

every day the newspapers had articles about how we were on the verge of nuclear war

And it was true. For example, at least in one instance, a single person prevented it.

Something being likely and there being reports about it, does not mean that the risk wasn't real if the threat is eventually prevented.

There's plenty of evidence to support the claims of AI causing havoc on the economy when it finally fails. It's an economically unviable product built by stealing from literally the entire world and then using obscene amounts of resources to function.

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

Just because we stumbled through a whole bunch of world-ending things in the past mostly unscathed doesn't mean we'll continue to do so.

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I hear you. You missed the hole in the ozone layer though.

[–] Seralth@piefed.seralth.com 2 points 1 hour ago

To be fair on that one it's one of the single best example of people coming together to actually solve a problem.

It's also one of the single best examples of why solving a problem goes unnoticed because it's boring and not news worthy.

[–] DeadDigger@lemmy.zip 1 points 50 minutes ago

That's just because you stopped looking it's still there and will close over Australia in 2050 something and over Europe in 2030 something