this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2026
82 points (94.6% liked)

memes

23938 readers
327 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

A person sent in a patch to get adobe working in wine recently but it might be till the end of this year when its merged in wine proper. They apparently consulted an LLM but it was as simple as making XML parse properly.

Actually existing software is a fuck.

[–] alexei_1917@hexbear.net 2 points 2 hours ago

actually existing software

This might be the weirdest thing I've read on Hexbear this week.

[–] RondoRevolution@hexbear.net 42 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

There's so many AI slop decomps right now, it fucking sucks. There's a lot of people that doesn't even understand the basics of coding doing it just to get these stuff running and it's so obvious it is gonna be abandoned because the prompter doesn't even know how to fix the bugs people file for their projects.

This is specially bad in the game decomp scene. Good thing there are actual good recomps/decomps being made, like SymphonyRecomp and MediEvilRecomp.

I get using AI to help with the more repetitive stuff and under really strict supervision, but there's way too many stuff just entirely vibecoded right now.

[–] medium_adult_son@hexbear.net 6 points 8 hours ago

Thanks for informing me about those decomps. These look awesome. There are lots of sites with listings of ports/decomps, thankfully this pcgamingwiki site lists if AI is used or not.

https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/List_of_unofficial_ports

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 27 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

There's so many AI slop decomps right now, it fucking sucks. There's a lot of people that doesn't even understand the basics of coding doing it just to get these stuff running and it's so obvious it is gonna be abandoned because the prompter doesn't even know how to fix the bugs people file for their projects.

Yes and the existence of the vibe coded project deters new projects with real effort from even occurring because people don't want to compete with other projects or stir drama by being a competing project. Additionally you know anything the serious project does is just gonna end up contributing to the vibe coded project which is a good reason for people not to want to do it. The very existence of this shit reduces the existence of better things.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 14 points 9 hours ago

Welcome to being an artist in the age of AI art!

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Eh, 'Yet another' is like at the core of the computing community. Nobody's out there complaining about a lack of Doom ports or Linux Distros.

[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Those weren't competing for attention and brainspace on every online repository. We're going to have to make "non-shit" lists for everything into the future because some mouthbreather discovered he can make some simulcrum of a finish job for like 12 things in a day.

Before if you wanted to make a fake game trailer for a game that didn't exist it took time to make it.

[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 14 points 9 hours ago

It's 2032, you're the last person on Earth subsisting on a stockpile of cans of proteined peaches and nutri-soda. You have a working internet connection to the human knowledge Xanadu Satellite Network. You only have an Intel Atom-powered netbook (has a disc drive somehow), a Philips CD-i, and one CD-RW. You want to play Doom on the CD-i, but thetr are 72 decomps on the forever-archived Github repository and all of the archived comments on their pages are spun-up bot networks accusing the others of being vibecoded.

You decide to download CDoom-i [NOT VIBECODED].

You burn it and start it up. The D-pad inputs are 90-degrees rotated to the right.

It's vibe-coded.

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

It's getting one foot in the door though. Humans can deslop the code later on

[–] fox@hexbear.net 25 points 11 hours ago

It's way, way harder to undo bad code than it is to write good code first.

[–] Hermes@hexbear.net 28 points 11 hours ago

"one foot in the door" is as useful as an "ideas guy", which is not at all. Producing slop themed around a project provides no value for anyone else who actually wants to work on it. If anything, skilled humans avoid working for free on projects or ideas associated with LLMs.

As you are an engineering student, you should be embarrassed for posting this comment.

[–] dead@hexbear.net 30 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Aradino@hexbear.net 1 points 47 minutes ago

But it's baaaaaaaaad

[–] acidburn@hexbear.net 18 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I already do. It's subpar at best, feature and UI wise. And yes I'm aware of the PhotoGIMP UI thing.

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So vibe-code LLM decompile is a thing now? You feed the compiled binaries into the LLM and it makes source code based on statistical models I'm assuming is how this is supposed to work? picard

Seems like just using LLM hacking agents to get the source code from the owners is probably a more effective approach. Desloppiled Code is just going to be a huge mess every time I'd imagine.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 19 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

The dev claims they are making a clean room replacement not a decompilation.

Clean room usually means having one person/team reverse engineer a product, write a detailed specification and have another person/team implement that specification so that it's not contaminated with copyrighted material.

I have my doubts about the clean room part but it's believable that it's not a decompilation project that aims to come close to the original code structure.

Desloppiled Code is just going to be a huge mess every time I'd imagine.

For sure. No human is ever touching that code.

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 18 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Oh, I recall seeing a post months ago about this LLM clean room approach being promoted as a service to "help remove license restrictions" on open source projects. They would deliver you a new chunk of code as a drop-in replacement for "restrictive license" existing code.

monke-rage

So now a similar approach is being taken to do the same for proprietary applications and games. Fucking hell this is so damn bleak.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Wasn't that website a bit? Not that it's hard to believe that this would exist (as a commercial service, we know people are doing this with coding agents).

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 7 points 12 hours ago

Perhaps I ate the onion on that one, but it's still a legit and active issue despite the service being a farce.

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Chardet-LLM-Rewrite-Relicense

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I thought that was a joke though, wasn't it?

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 4 points 12 hours ago

I clicked through to the site that was linked in the post, and it seemed pretty legit looking, but maybe it was a ruse. I can't recall the site/service name now though.

[–] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 16 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

My hope is that this type of shit leads to better decompile techniques not using LLMs. I watched a video that said that one of these decompiled vibecoded apps cost $180k in tokens on a $200/month plan

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 13 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Who is dropping $200k to "decompile" photoshop

[–] fox@hexbear.net 17 points 11 hours ago

In this case, Anthropic. They let someone paying $200/mo use however many tokens they would charge $180k for at their current API billing.

Since Anthropic subsidizes even API tokens at something like 10:1, this decompile may have cost Anthropic on the order of $2 million.

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 20 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

nobody, "$180k in tokens" doesn't actually mean $180k is changing hands at any point in this process

[–] Feed_el_Castro@hexbear.net 3 points 2 hours ago

It does mean that though, in expense in data centres and energy.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I watched a video that said that one of these decompiled vibecoded apps cost $180k in tokens on a $200/month plan

For that much you could probably pay a team of coders.

[–] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 20 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

No one paid that amount: it’s the dollar equivalent of the billions of tokens that were used by the LLMs. The “devs” only used a $200/month subscription to do the decompiling. This business model is why AI companies aren’t profitable since compute is wildly more expensive than what they’re charging users.

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 9 points 11 hours ago

AI slop ends up costing almost as much as a senior developer if you use tokens/hr as your metric. Except a senior dev is responsible and trains juniors.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ah. Hell even for $200 I'm sure you could hire someone freelance though

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 5 points 8 hours ago

For an hour maybe. This kind of work takes a lot of talent. Or nowadays... a prompt 🤷‍♀️

IDK this stuff is only gonna get better. It's gonna be crazy seeing what code is being put out in a few years by these tools.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 13 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

A decompile of sonic the fighters came out for pc and it was only up for a day before being taken down. It was vibe coded and didn't even work right.

If the app compiles to the same binary, it is not vibecoded, just the original code, I guess they just fed the model how the app is supposed to work and the binary so the LLM just guesses the library dependencies and some strings if the Adobe binary is not obfuscated

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 3 points 13 hours ago

I feel like GUI coding would actually be pretty LLM friendly if it were paired with hard constraints and interaction trees (that were done manually or with a framework, the latter being much better for accessibility). Unfortunately people seem to mostly just take whatever it gets and say, "looks nice" and ship it.