I have a question about the nature of this "anti-TESCREALism". "TESCREALism" has an intellectual content that includes things like life extension, philanthropic utilitarianism, and concern with the long-term future and the rise of superhuman AI. Then there's a host of things that have no inherent connection to that intellectual content, like the sex parties, belief in racial IQ differences, consorting with tech billionaires, etc. Where would this nonprofit's opposition be focused?
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2026
14 points (100.0% liked)
SneerClub
1305 readers
8 users here now
Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.
AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)
This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.
[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]
See our twin at Reddit
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Dawg most of their core beliefs and supported causes really just boil down to eugenics or ableism, including the “intellectual content” that you are positioning as harmless/benign
@Mitchell_Porter The point here is that TESCREAL is a nascent syncretistic religion, like early Christianity during the first centuries CE (before the first Council of Nicaea). In modern terms, it's a cult or exhibits cult-like traits. And cults generally attract narcissistic psychopaths and grifters who use them for self-enrichment and sex at the expense of the more normal (gullible) followers.
The purpose of a system is what it does. Watch what TESCREAL does. And what its boosters do with it.
Do you have any experience of seeing vulnerable idealists destroyed, not by manipulative gurus, but by the indifference and incomprehension of ordinary society? The latter is closer to what I've seen happen to "TESCREAL believers". But as I always say, I have been remote from the center of things, if the center is identified by money and media attention. Perhaps at that center it's more as you say.
The Banner Bright
Gradient clippers. In machine learning, learning too quickly can cause a model to "explode," and the technique to prevent it from moving too quickly is called gradient clipping. So, if you apply that to technology, gradient clippers would be opposed to accelerationism.
We used to be disgusted
Now we try to be amused
maybe that's more for this site
PATTERN
People Against Technocracy Transformation by Evangelical Rich Nazis.
The thread seems to be dropping off, but this is gold.
Stable Technology Initiative! Uhhh wait that's not right...
Seriously though, something emphasizing stability would probably be quite effective, if overemphasizing the bad guys' shitty software products in contrast to their destructive social attitudes. Stable Technology Society, Society for Stable Technology, Stable and Equitable Technology Society...
Software quality is already generally pretty terrible; heavyweight, buggy software is crammed into more places than it really needs to be; and people are going to have even worse experiences with shoddy technology in the years ahead. Emphasizing stable technology that just works and continues to do its job for years, or even a human lifetime, is pretty hard for the "move-fast-and-break-things" crowd to assail, especially as the bill for living in their world continues to come due.
the human frame
Association Opposing Greed and Idiocy.
Doesn't lend itself to snickering. Gets the point across. Hard to turn into "well actually the real greed is sharing".
I feel like so much of the TESCREAL narrative is about a particular kind of line-goes-up futurism that something about an egalitarian or democratic future could help demonstrate where our vision differs and foreground where their ideology is fundamentally authoritarian. The word "democratic" is probably unusable in a US context, regrettably. I'd also like to snipe at the longtermists specifically and emphasize making the future better by solving the problems that are right in front of us now rather then ignoring them and hoping they go away.
Working Today for a Free and Equal Tomorrow or something?
I think anything with language about advocacy, speaking out, justice, fairness etc. is good because it contrasts with the EA belief that public policy must only be discussed in a totally values neutral way with any personal standpoints optimized out.
Society for Egalitarian Technology and Ethical Computation
poo poo pee pee gang
Nowtermism
Or otherwise something drawing attention to the problems that exist in the world today, as I feel that’s the big antithesis to everything TESCREALists worry about (besides the racism, of course).
Hmmm...
-
Reaction Watch (like retraction watch but, you know. reactionaries)
-
Mad At Reactionary Techies
-
Action Against Computer Cults
-
Computer Users Against Reactionary Losers
-
Silicon Valley Antifa
-
???
Actual altruists.
If you form a band you could be the Death Spirals.
not pitching an alternative because your suggestion is better, but I'm always tickled when I get to use the phrase "Actually Existing", e.g. "Actually Existing Altruists" (see: "actually existing socialism")
Tech Cult Watch ?
What kind of activities are intended exactly, journalism, lobbying?
the Association for Software Sanity
with corresponding conference the Association for Software Sanity Home for Originating Less Entropy
Global Organisation Against TESCREAL (and) Surveillance Entrepreneurship
“Hmmmm… let’s see if a relevant domain name is available… com, no… org, no…maybe something less common… let’s try cx,…GRAHHHHHHH!!! NOOOO!!!”
Per contemptum ad astra.
Honestly, I say we just mug what's left of the Situationist International and take their shit over
WressLong?
This seems a good time to remember Dale Carrico, the Berkeley rhetorician and Hannah Arendt fan who was opposing what he dubbed "superlative" futurological discourse, as long ago as 2009.
I'd never heard of him but this curriculum for a class about futurology seems great and pointed.
Both ranting and raving will be involved.
Hmm....how about R.A.V.I.N.G: Rise Against Voracious IT Nazi Ghouls?
Pile Of Opposed People!
Grounded Humanists, perhaps?
getting there, tho i fear the New Atheist failure mode
Yeah, and to be clear I’m unabashedly a humanist myself, but at this point in time I have to treat “Humanist” in org names as a red flag.
...Justified Luddites?
“Luddites” for short.
The Centre for Actual Creativity
I wonder how much would it cost to have a booth at Fringe to stir trouble with?