this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2026
262 points (98.9% liked)

News

39342 readers
3346 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

...

I'm currently waiting in the break room of the S&DC I work at waiting for a truck. I was supposed to start work 35 minutes ago. If USPS doesn't have the budget to hand me a 40 year old LLV then I don't think they'll have the budget to put cameras in all of the fleet. Hell, I can't even get a Duck and the parking lot is full of them.

[–] corvide077@lemmy.zip 8 points 10 hours ago

Can I just put a QR code on my mailbox that has a sql injection?

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 95 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like the same thing one or two cities in Texas put on the trash trucks. Giving addresses a blight score and sending citations for things like trash and broken down vehicles.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

I don’t think people realize how widespread this is already. Look up Samsara. A shitton of work trucks/municipal vehicles already have cameras.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 76 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Can't hide behind "it's a private company surveiling you" when it's mounted on federal property

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 15 points 20 hours ago

Plus, it'll feed into federal databases - yay!

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 54 points 21 hours ago

Its website says Next Base’s cameras record in up to 4K, and can capture every “license plate” with precision. The cameras don’t run automatic license plate reader (ALPR) software, though.

But the servers do, that goes unspoken of course.

[–] hcf@sh.itjust.works 56 points 22 hours ago

Oh, neat! So like, daily surveillance routes for everyone!

:-/

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Well, Flock USPS!

[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The thing is, you don't need an "ALPR" system on the vehicle. That can be done remotely after the fact. My point is, it's worse than you might be thinking.

[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I’m aware. As I said in the linked comment, I’m more concerned about the data being collected than I am about being recorded.

In the long term people need to control the collection and use of the data and establish some significant penalties for misuse. It would be nice if, in the US, we could establish that any data gathered by ALPRs is covered under the 4th amendment and require a warrant for starters.

I also think the data should be required to be stored by the government agency utilizing it, no third parties.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 9 points 18 hours ago
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 22 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Flock cameras for your neighborhood.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

...so they can sell it to the highest bidder and line Trump pockets

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 18 hours ago

So the know the daily movements of anyone who speaks out against them.

They will slowly boil into acting on it, but god damn are they setting the stage.

Couple this with the fact that soon the only computing devices you will be able to buy are low memory tablets and other walled-garden locked down tech devices dependent on the cloud.

One bad tweet against Emperor Musk or Demigod Trump and they’ll fucking destroy you by cutting off your access to pay your bills.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That means it looks directly at the road to check for potholes, right?

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That would require them to look forward or backwards, at all. The Texas trash trucks with this shir have them mounted to the side. Because they're intended to find issues they can cite your property for violations and score your neighborhood like an HOA Karen would.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The article says these are forward-looking.

[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago
[–] reid@piefed.ca 2 points 15 hours ago

Soon they will make all the drivers wear meta glasses oh wait I mean federal government approved community safety glasses...

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 4 points 18 hours ago

I heard they're also going to be putting them on mail carriers. It's only a matter of time until postmen start getting cut down like flock cameras are.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

Now THATS mass surveillance.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 4 points 20 hours ago

I get it, like the vans on V for Vendetta.

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

You have been Vanned

Wow. I mean, it’s a really obvious play, but… wow.

[–] UpAndAtThem@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Pretty soon it won't just be dogs attacking the mailman, poor bastards.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Article didn't say anything more specific than "help identify roadway conditions and support community safety"

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 13 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Sure, just like that Ring ad where their new software was only going to be looking for lost dogs ....

Plus, once they're approved for one use, it's incredibly easy to slip in a provision for other uses as well. That whole "we're doing this to protect the children" thing they keep bleating.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 4 points 18 hours ago

Yup, just one software update, and even of ot starts innocent...

[–] Monument@piefed.world 4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

What else could ‘community safety’ mean here? They’re planning it from the start.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago

I'll let you pick the exact offense cited, but I guarantee it's going to be racist.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 points 18 hours ago

Even ignoring the surveillance state part... citing your property for ordinance violations. Dallas, Texas trash trucks already do that through a system like this.

They 100% would justify ordinance citations alone as "community safety".

[–] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Don't most cars do that now?

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 14 points 21 hours ago

Yes, but mail vans go to just about every single address and are operated by the federal government directly. There's no hoops the feds need to go through to get the footage (I mean, there already isn't much, but still, this removes the little hoops that remained).