this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2026
208 points (100.0% liked)

privacy

11243 readers
29 users here now

Big tech and governments are monitoring and recording your eating activities. c/Privacy provides tips and tricks to protect your privacy against global surveillance.

Partners:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 39 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Not my 20-year-old car.

Without regulation, this will continue, and get worse. Remember to vote in every election you can, both local, and national.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Democrats aren't campaigning on this stuff so I'm not sure how voting is going to help this particular issue. They don't seem to care about it much.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 3 points 5 days ago

Like this: Vote GOP and they won't so much as listen to their constituency. Vote Dem and there's some possibility that calls, letters, etc will get them to do something that favors their constituency. Voting is the first step. Making yourself heard, and being an ongoing nuisance about it is the second step. And you better believe that the conservative constituents are doing both steps. Democracy IS a Verb, in fact it's a Gerund, it's an ongoing process.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

What does voting have to do with anything?

If you were paying attention about automobile privacy, you would known that democrats signed legislation into law in 2024 that requires all cars sold in the US to have driver monitoring software.

https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/nhtsa-finalizes-key-safety-rule-reduce-crashes-and-save-lives

https://www.gadgetreview.com/federal-surveillance-tech-becomes-mandatory-in-new-cars-by-2027

Partisan politics mean squat in the privacy sphere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Are you sure about that? OnStar has been a thing since what? The 90s?

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's not OEM, though. Those idiot consumers only have themselves to blame.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Xyphius@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

I love my '93 excel. Just about manual everything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This stuff is why I'm apprehensive of buying anything remotely new.

The problem is, I also don't want to burn prehistoric forests to travel.

So this sits in opposition to the fact that I want to travel around using the light from the sun as my primary energy source.

For those that can't read between the lines, I want an EV, that I can charge by solar.

I am also aware of the slate truck. I have thoughts on it, but it's worthy of consideration.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 16 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I really hope the Slate truck is everything they say it will be. Its lack of spyware is a pretty compelling reason to buy one.

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 days ago

My biggest concern with it is Bezos' involvement.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I looked it up now, slate truck. Seems like a good idea. I never cared for infotainment at all.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I do, but only in the aspect of using Android auto/Apple carplay....

Anything else available from the infotainment system is usually just to facilitate that connection for me.

I already have everything on my phone, why do I also need it on my dash?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] radish6367@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Same here. I wish Canada had a company making something similar since I’d rather not support the US economy. Choose your poison, I guess.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] molten@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sus that it's another bezos company

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 11 points 6 days ago

He's an investor, I'm not sure how big of a stake he has and I wish he didn't have one but I'm happy to have an option to not be surveilled by my own vehicle.

[–] itkovian@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Big Tech companies think they have solved advertising with infinite data. According to them, privacy can go fuck itself.

[–] myyass@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

The irony is, you can try and advertise but I stopped paying attention a long time ago. Besides, I'm too busy spending all my money on living, fuel, and food. Good Luck Have Fun. And my cars are all over 20 years old. GG

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 5 points 5 days ago

well yes, it's why I have a Chinese car, they don't share my data with my government who are the ones that may want to hurt me.

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)
[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Good. now get yourself a faraday bag for your phone.

Already stripped it of all proprietary software and don't put a SIM in it, so I'm good.

My phone does what I want. It doesn't spy on me

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

I want to ride my bicycle, I want to ride my biiiiiiiiiiiiiike!

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

e-bikes. Bet they already do lol. So many people believe the "e" stands for "electric", but it actually stands for "enshitification"

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Sharing" implies something much less predatory than the actual relationship.

Let me go bring a gun to a bank and see if they'd like to share any of their money with me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I have a 2010 Mazda Pickup. It doesn't even share with me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

b..b...bbut...but CHINESE CARS ARE EVIL and untrustable unlike cars from good countries which would never betray us! Ban Chinese cars!!!!!

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

My car is doing no such thing, but it's a manual that's old enough to vote.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What the fuck isn’t? Doesn’t even need to be connected to your WiFi. Devices can have cellular modems built into them now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 6 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Had anyone published a guide on how to strip these sensors yet?

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Yes there's a YouTube video for various disable techniques via fuses or jumper wire kits. Such as this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e09Kjj2awG0

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Thanks, but that guy doesn't sound like he knows what he was talking about.

He literally admitted that he had to get "information" from grok, and he never fact checked it.

There was no attempt to find or disable cameras, microphones, seat pressure sensors, etc. Those cars he "disabled" are probably still collecting all of the data and storing it locally. Just waiting for a dealer to plug it in to upload everything.

We really need just one person with car hacking skills to document how to disable the sensors (and then do a forensic analysis to confirm the data is no longer being collected). Then we'll all have at least one privacy car.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It was an example, there are deeper dive videos also, and links to kits to buy that bypasses the units but tells the car things are still fine. Agreed we do nerd better hacking, but then Auto companies would sue

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Right to repair prevents these sorts of law suits

But that's only for companies selling the hacking as a paid service. There is zero standing to sue a guy hacking his own car and providing the info for free on the Internet (or, eg, at defcon).

Only thing they can do is void your warranty

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They will claim decryption of proprietary code or something that violates Digital Rights Controls

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

People do that all the time. It's not illegal to reverse engineer something you own (at least in the US).

It might be illegal to sell something from what you've reverse engineered

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

It's not, I take things apart and repair them all the time. Those VOID stickers mean nothing. However the DMCA is expliclit on decryption, and that would be what they'd charge people with.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) makes it illegal to circumvent technical measures (e.g., encryption, copy protection) that prevent access to copyrighted materials, such as computer software or media content.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago

Countries are selling out their citizens to car companies in the name of "traffic safety"

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And yet, it likely has an FB account anyway. ☝🏼

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

Wild if true

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

No. MY car ain't sending shit. MY car is a 2004 Nissan which was built before all that BS started getting included in every facet of our lives.

[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Hoopty-ass shitmobile drivers unite!

[–] Vendetta@feddit.org 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›