this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
140 points (98.6% liked)

Just Post

1637 readers
124 users here now

Just post something ๐Ÿ’›

Lemmy's general purpose discussion community with no specific topic.

Sitewide lemmy.world rules apply here.

Additionally, this is a no AI content community. We are here for human interaction, not AI slop! Posts or comments flagged as AI generated will be removed.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I wonder what the data covers. Does it show only genuine browser traffic or also apps? Do apps that periodically phone home for updates, like mail apps, count towards the 'attention'? Is that why gmail is so massive?

I would also like to know this. I've gotten rid of my streaming services and social media (minus the fediverse), but I don't see how people spend more time on Facebook than on Netflix. I have wasted entire weekends binge watching TV.

I think it also might be USA centric

[โ€“] Jason@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If I open a tab for gmail and leave it for 24 hours, is that 24 hours worth of 'activity'?

[โ€“] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Better yet, if you are having the gmail app installed, is the app checking in the background counted as activity? Might explain Facebook's share. Mark 'Zuccy the Zucc' Zuckerberg famously gets pinged every time a Facebook user's heart beats.

[โ€“] dsilverz@catodon.rocks 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is it just me or the lack of "adult entertainment" websites makes it look like this diagram is deeply incomplete?

!justpost@lemmy.world

[โ€“] Gonzako@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Well then they'd be a massive block being "Genitals"

[โ€“] timochka@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel like there are natural, err, limits to how long one can spend on those sites, surely?

you'd be suprised

[โ€“] shweddy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Now do it based on the company that owns the sites

[โ€“] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

volunteered to do the paper forms for highschool signups at the start of the year last year. Nearly 100% of the kids had a Gmail address but the parents had around ~60% Gmail ~30% Hotmail and ~10% yahoo.

[โ€“] Egonallanon@feddit.uk 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Jackinopolis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Old people set their homepage and never looked back.

Also, Verizon's email service was provided by AOL up until a couple of years ago. Or at least the shambling husk that called itself AOL, whichever entity that ultimately may have been.

[โ€“] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

And never turn off the monitor

[โ€“] SqueakySpider@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

as I expected, undisclosed USA centric study

[โ€“] StellarExtract@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

The whole fediverse is somewhere down in the fog. Maybe someday it will BE the fog.

[โ€“] TomMasz@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Twitter gets less attention than Yahoo Mail ?

[โ€“] EtnaAtsume@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately, I don't have the data close at hand, but Twitter is actually not used by that many people online. You'd be surprised given the huge amount of proliferation that Twitter screenshots get, but honestly, I think that might just be a psyop, or I'm just paranoid.

[โ€“] TomMasz@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

It's definitely punching above its weight class, that's for sure.

[โ€“] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

what cracks me up is I will often mention the importance of email and I get flak for it like being old and going away and that is not where people do stuff today and its going away or such. Looks to me like its the largest general thing up there. 25% of the named blocks and I would not be surprised if its a higher percentage of the unnamed ones.

[โ€“] Tenthrow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are they not counting Tik Tok and instagram?

I see Instagram in the third row from below, second square from the right.

TikTok, not sure.

[โ€“] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

This is just website traffic. It probably wouldn't cover app only experiences like TikTok

[โ€“] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

more people use chatgpt than reddit? The famously massive, addictive website? Are you kidding me? I wonder, as a person that's never used AI beyond sometimes perusing the "AI answers" that results from a google search, am I a unicorn? How many other people have never used it?

[โ€“] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think there are people practically LIVING on these AIs.

[โ€“] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

honestly terrifying. offloading all your critical thinking to someone (anyone) else is how we get cults. When will the cult of chatgpt start? Probably already has, honestly.

[โ€“] RumorsOfLove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[โ€“] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I haven't taken time to track down the source, which is honestly why I'm sharing here instead of the dataisbeautiful community this time.

[โ€“] jcr@jlai.lu 3 points 1 week ago

Where is wikipedia ๐Ÿ˜ญ

[โ€“] Mika@piefed.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn't expect gmail to be so high.

[โ€“] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I imagine a lot of people have a tab with whatever their mail service is open all the time, and it's not much of a stretch to assume that Gmail is the most popular one. I'd doubt people are actively looking at it all that time, though.

Gmail will also send keep-alive pings back to Google's servers regularly until your login times out, which if I recall correctly lasts one week.

[โ€“] Mika@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Thats poor metric then, I do have tabs open but that's sub 1% of my daily screentime.

[โ€“] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What evil creepy browser extensions and cookies did they have to trick unsuspecting users into installing in order to collect this data?

[โ€“] YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth 4 points 1 week ago

You might be surprised to learn that nearly all sites collect this data by default. It's built into the standard analytics package of most hosted WordPress services, Cloudflare, Google, etc.

A simple JS script can collect your system and browser info, generalized location, exactly where your mouse is and for how long (which links you hovered over but didn't click, how you found menus and submenus, etc.), which search engine you used to get to the site, how long you stayed on each page, and so much more.

You need a browser extension to not provide this data, even on Firefox. I always recommend uBlock Origin and Privacy Badger. The two together generally do a good job of blocking most of these scripts.

Source: I'm a web developer

[โ€“] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

sad ass graph

[โ€“] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

is computationally prohibitive

Imagemagick would do that in a snap.

[โ€“] pineapple@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago
[โ€“] Digit@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

I think I see diaspora on there.... ... way up in the top right corner.