This is literally in The Handmaid's Tale, which US chuds seem to have taken as an instruction manual.
Slop.
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
If you are a chud and somehow failing to socialize in the west…HOW!?!!!
How the fuck can chuds be lonely in the west!?! You want lonely? Try being a non-chud! Hell, try being a woman or a minority! Why the hell should I feel lonely and not them?
Aside from the obvious AI image, what will happen if I don't want to have a gf? Will I get my semen forcibly extracted?
Yeah a cop takes a pretty woman to their local neet misanthrope chud? She won't be smiling. This is how you go back to women poisoning the fuck out of men, feminism means less men turning purple and green choking on their nuggies
*Fewer
"Less" here refers the the phenomenon of men turning purple and green choking on their nuggies, not discrete incidents of men turning purple and green choking on their nuggies
But isn't a phenonemon sort of non-quantifiable? The only coherent way of talking about 'less' or 'more' in this case is in terms of the discrete number of men turning purple and green choking on their nuggies, unless we're talking about the total amount of time spent by men turning purple and green choking on their nuggies, which I suppose is a continuous quantity. But still a somewhat odd way of quantifying as it's quite heavily biased by how fast-acting different poisons are.
I know these incel creeps dehumanise women to an absurd degree, but how do they expect this thing to even work? Where do all the women come from in this state mandated girlfriend thing? Like, you know they won't settle for anything less than perfectly white, straight, hollywood good looks type of women, who are all still delicate little virgin flowers but also have the sex skills of a porn star, which I imagine there aren't really a whole lot of in the US.
And in turn, any woman forced into this state mandated girlfriend policy probably has a very easy out, to just get a boyfriend first and then she can't be forcibly assigned to one. I imagine almost every woman would probably pick some random relatively decent guy off the street rather than the sort of disgusting sewer surfing CHUD that would sign up for a state mandated girlfriend program. So the logistics of this just doesn't make sense.
Unless they expect all women to be forcibly separated from their partners are forced into this program, which I don't imagine any of them would appreciate, nor would their partners, nor their friends and family, or pretty much anyone who isn't a completely isolated disgusting little incel. There'd be riots in the street, even the regular MAGAs would probably be opposing this.
So the idea that this would somehow make Trump more popular is just so strange. Only the CHUDDiest of CHUDs would actually want to vote for the guy who proposes this, and they're already voting for Trump anyway, and I imagine most women wouldn't approve of a program that is basically just gender segregated slavery, and probably wouldn't vote for him, even white women, since it would actually disproportionately affect them. Not to mention anyone with a conscience, or any of the "fuck you, I've got mine" CHUDs who are already in a relationship.
Additionally, I can't imagine what these guys imagine a relationship entails. Or...maybe I sort of could, but really don't want to think about it, because it sounds like they imagine less of an "equal partner" and more of a "sex slave who isn't allowed to disobey me", which is also just kind of slimey of them to pretend to dance around. I think that's what disgusts me the most about incels, they're disgusting and view women solely as objects for their sexual pleasure, but they try to pretend they don't, they should be more honest about what disgusting scumbags they are, because it's not like they're good at hiding it.
I imagine that if this was actually tried, it would be more of a eugenics program using the "state mandated girlfriend" shit as a cover.



This seems very obviously not something the guy who posted it is seriously advocating for, and I feel like I'm crazy here because literally everyone else in this thread is acting otherwise. The post reads exactly like when my friend says she wants the guy from her romance novel mailed to her door. That's a comment on loneliness and not literally advocating for a real action. It feels like we're all psychoanalyzing her shitty joke.
Like there's a lot you can say about how Epstein was accepted among the elites because of fucked-up attitudes already prevalent in society and how that is indicative of a very real threat, but this whole thread reads like "and it could be meant sincerely, which is the real danger" when the real danger is repeatedly being said explicitly in plain english over there.
This guy could be a hardcore misogynist, but he could also be a lonely teenage kid who would figure it out pretty fast in the right friend group. (Which would be a sad situation, I hope he finds that.) Why are we reading the runes on him rather than refreshing the twitter feed one time?
Poster named Christian is incredibly oblivious to evil
Another Kojima nominative determinism Banger 
We have seen that for over a decade now this shit is just a joke to these guys until it isn't.
These wojak memes are regularly a format of genuine political expression with an element of plausible deniability.
Account is 10 years old. Fair to assume that the dude is at least in his 20s.
Nah, these scum are genuinely serious, hell this belief is tame considering the filth they spew when they believe "normies" aren't around, you haven't seen the "legalizeremoved and sex slavery" forums and threads that pass as day to day dialogue among concentrated online incels, in fact even though this has been memory holed by the internet at large, the term incel first breached containment into the mainstream around eleven years ago because of a infamous thread on an incel forum where the users arguedremoved could be justified
It's like that Sartre quote about antisemitism: the fascist has the right to play. They're always making "jokes" which are never just a joke, because they know their own beliefs are unpopular (even broadly hated), so they hide their serious beliefs behind absurdity.
The post reads exactly like when my friend says she wants the guy from her romance novel mailed to her door.
The difference being that there aren't human trafficking networks that ship dreamy hunks to lonely AO3 users, but there are human trafficking networks that enslave people, read: mostly women, from the global south so they can be SAd by western men. Not to mention that there is an oingoing rightwing project to bring back "tradwifes", read: making women basically the property of their husbands again, which is something that for a lot of older people is still within living memory. Go read up how divorce law used to be until the 1970s. When my mom got married, she could not even open a bank account or start a job without written approval from her husband. That was the law in my country back then. In the 1960s. And the guy who made that cartoon wants that back.
How can you think that's the same as your lonely friend joking about her romance novels? It is not, there are entire layers of systemic violence missing. This is like comparing a black person saying cracker to a white person saying the n-word, or comparing a trans woman making forcefem jokes to a terf taking people's HRT away. Universalism has its limits, and they show up wherever one group has the structural, systemic power to make the other group's life hell.
This guy could be a hardcore misogynist, but he could also be a lonely teenage kid
People in the incel community always are both hardcore misogynist and lonely af. When i look at these communities, i also see that they often long for emotional closeness and connection to somebody more than for sex or romance. But that does not change that they are absolutely vile misogynists.
And this 100% was made by an incel in the sense of "member of a mysogynist online community" and not an incel in the sense of "awkward but nice kid who just can't get laid". The entire meme screams incel, every wojak, every wording. Yes, i know, wojaks are used by everybody now, it's honestly scary how much reach incels now have culturally, but that's part of the problem here, isn't it? And "government mandated girlfriend" has been a talking point among them for 20 years now. The phrase is older than the term incel itself, and it has always boiled down to "every man should get one woman as his personal slave and what the woman thinks about it does not matter because we do not view women as people with internality and agency."
who would figure it out pretty fast in the right friend group
Let me tell you about my experience with /r9k/. Way back before Gamergate, i stumbled upon 4chan. And because i was really bad at picking my battles back then, i spent a couple years debating reactionaries there. Especially incels. They didn't call themselves incels then, they had not yet appropriated that term from the lonely woman who would later coin it. They called themselves permavirgins, foreveralones etc., but it was the exact same thing otherwise. And i've always had nerdy friends, socially awkward friends, neurodivergent friends, people who took a lot of time to get used to the whole dating thing. But for my friends, that always worked in the end.
So i thought i could help these proto-incels. Give them advice. As it was an anonymous site and they could not recognize me, i was free to go groundhog day and try every possible approach. Uncomfortable truths, compassion and commiserating, talking them up, pointing out how my friends had hooked up with their partners in spite of not being square-jawed jocks etc. etc. Nothing worked. Every single time, it was like talking to a wall. They absolutely insisted on being intrinsically undateable and nothing could snap them out of it. I've never seen so much self-pity and fatalism in my entire life. It's no wonder they coined the term "blackpilled" a few years down the line.
Fast forward to me approaching my egg crack and watching way too much ContraPoints, including her Incels video (which, in hindsight, is its own can of worms, but let's not have that discussion now). She lays out the basics, i go "mhmmm, yeah, i recognize that, omg yes, that's exactly what they're like" and then she gets to how the community deflects attempts to help them. And they literally have a whole genre of memes to counter every single approach i've tried with them back in the day.
tl;dr: You can't help incels. Save your time and energy for people who are willing to accept help and who aren't a misogynist death cult.
This makes me feel just about every negative emotion. Anger, disguist, sadness, hatred, all of it.
here's an idea that will appeal to both sides: the state mandated girlfriend and state forced feminization bureaus are the same bureau. Every incel who signs up gets randomly assigned to either receive, or be, a girlfriend.
Every incel who signs up gets randomly assigned to either receive, or be, a girlfriend.
Nah everyone gets feminized and a girlfriend 
"I'm a massive fucking loser and I would vote for trump if he forced a woman to spend time with me"

