this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
63 points (94.4% liked)

Texas

2469 readers
56 users here now

A community for news, current events, and overall topics regarding the state of Texas

Other Texas/US Lemmy Communties to follow

Sports

BYPASSING PAYWALLS

Base Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

DALLAS — Democratic U.S. Senate nominee James Talarico on Wednesday said he opposed transgender student-athletes competing in girls’ sports “if it endangers safety or fairness,” reversing course on previous positions he took while in the Texas House opposing restrictions on trans athletes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 47 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

Democratic candidates need to stop bending the knee to fascism for votes and instead attract voters by pointing out all of the horrible economic and foreign policy decisions the Republicans have enabled Trump to implement.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 42 points 5 days ago (1 children)

James Talarico could've literally said nothing about transgender issues and focused on economic, the current failed systems, lack of safety nets. Hostile sentiments towards Trans Americans are already fairly high, this dumb fucker didn't have to add fuel to the fire. It didn't occur to him to direct energy towards things that matter: Dismantling the federally protected and elected ring of pedophiles, billionaires, and corporations that are working together towards a very nasty purpose. You know, that major goal using Project 2025 as a template to dismantle democracy; to make working class people have no choice but work, keep us scared, desperate, and sick. They might not win it since there are more of us than them, but, we still need to stand up to these chuds.

[–] Cataath@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

The real answer should have that, of the 345 million Americans that are are facing homelessness, water shortages, diminishing crop yields, runaway inflation, countless consumer scams, souring gas prices, collapsing education systems and infrastructure, this is an issue that affects maybe a dozen people.

[–] Yew@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Which is basically never. He's trying to walk the fence and appeal to everyone.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Just going to get dogpiled by Matt Walsh types screaming "What is a Woman?!" from the cheap seats.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 29 points 5 days ago

If it risks safety or fairness

Ah, the classic meaningless political statement.

[–] charokol@lemmy.zip 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Dignifying this “issue” with any stance is the wrong move. Why is this what we’re debating when the country is being destroyed by pedophiles and billionaires?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Dignifying this “issue” with any stance is the wrong move.

Can't have trans people thinking anyone is in their corner.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_q@piefed.social 27 points 5 days ago

Fence riders get splinters in their asses.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 25 points 5 days ago

Good! NOW he Can get the "I want to KILL ALL DEMOCRATS!" vote while Alienating the "We REALLY WANT to Vote Democrat!" vote!

[–] Ribbons@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've seen people elsewhere handwave this as "playing politics" since it's Texas and all, but there are ways to cede ground to people you're trying to sway without completely fucking throwing an entire marginalized community under the bus once again. Yeah, using flowery wishy-washy language provides a convenient out if you put all of the weight on the word "if" but reading between the lines shows that we're just a political playing chip on the best of days and that you also just want us dead all the same on the worst of days.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 days ago

Politicians gonna pol.

But they don't have to like this.

[–] DeadEndLink@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 days ago

Surprise! DNC sells out another minority.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

Well, you’re not a real Democrat until you become explicit about your cowardice.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (20 children)

Unfortunately, hes still the lesser of evils.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Paxton is a legitimate monster

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)

In pretty much every case there is no risk to safety or fairness. The best the right can come up with is anecdotes.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 8 points 5 days ago

I wonder if it's the same fairness issue that forbids women to compete with men on the shooting range for outperforming the latter

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

And now he will be purity tested out of existence, lettin paxton win. I bet he helps the trans community.

[–] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yes don't let perfect be the enemy of good. No one is perfect. I agree with Talarico on 90%+. Paxton less than 10.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

That's not how this works. The way it works is that the Democrats triangulate to make their position more palatable to racists, homophobes, and Christian nationalists and then they lose their base who knows better than the candidates that the far right will never vote for a D and triangulating just continues to repeat dangerous lies that the extreme right use to justify their violence. We need more full-voiced opposition to the right with strategic approaches to the middle, not tactical capitulation that reveals just how hollow and weak the candidates who claim allyship are.

I bet you Talarico is in favor of weight classes in boxing. Does that mean he goes around saying "I am opposed to fat people in sports when it effects safety and fairness". No. Because it's not a political issue. It's a technical and professional one that's already being addressed and he doesn't need to go in and make fat people unsafe by saying he opposes them and thinks they are unsafe and are unfair.

The entire idea of sports is against safety and fairness. Might as well stay in a padded room all your life.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 5 days ago

Ah yes sports, the notoriously "fair" activity sports.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Maybe an unpopular opinion, but he's not wrong, is he?

In lieu of gender-based leagues (a flawed concept in the first place), sports should probably be divided into physical weight/height classes in order to make sure that people of various builds have a fair shot and aren't going to be murdered in a big rugby tackle or whatever. That's not an unreasonable or anti-trans position to take.

[–] charokol@lemmy.zip 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

And then you’ll hear complaints when smaller-built guys start getting classed with women

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 days ago

Used to happen (and prob still does) in HS wrestling. There were never enough girls so they'd just wrestle with boys, and since it was by weight class they were almost inevitably with the smaller guys.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

sports should probably be divided into physical weight/height classes

The issue with that approach is that women who are the same weight and approximate leanness as a given man are nowhere near as strong. I used to compete in a weight category sport and was genuinely surprised at the strength difference I had over similarly sized (absolute ass kicker) ladies.

I had just assumed we'd be comparable given we were fighting around the same weight and they were lean as fuck.

I'm guessing the main conservative talking points are around trans women having an unfair advantage based off that strength difference when they were pre-transition. I've no knowledge or understanding of whether the drop in testosterone / rise in oestrogen would maintain any advantage over time (and if anyone does know I'd love to learn).

Edit: I see OP posted another comment with links to studies basically saying the edge deteriorates to zero over time. Not sure what the fucking problem is then except for pearl clutching.

load more comments
view more: next ›