this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2026
-67 points (14.7% liked)

Open Source

48932 readers
259 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
kevincox@lemmy.ml
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml
-67
I found a portable AI coding agent that solves a boring but real problem (github.com)
submitted 1 day ago by khasky@lemmy.world to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

πŸ’» I came across OpenClaude-Portable and I like the idea mostly because it reduces repeated setup.

It packages an AI coding agent into a self-contained folder and supports 9 providers, including Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama and LM Studio.

Settings, API keys and sessions stay inside the project directory.

Cloud providers still need internet, but with Ollama or another local provider the coding workflow can stay local once configured.

It supports Windows, Linux and macOS. πŸ’Ύ

To me, the interesting part is not "coding from a flash drive". It is being able to move the whole agent environment between machines.

Has anyone here tried doing this from a USB SSD in a real workflow?

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] borosilicate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Let’s be real. You made this.

This project is ferociously ignorant.

At no point in your rambling, incoherent post were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

β€œNo installation required”. Scrolls down:

to install:

chmod +x start.sh
./start.sh

Just run this sketchy vibecoded executable and give it permissions. 😳

[–] yxc999@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago

how about no

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

The only problem is people using LLMs and AIs.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

"Now you too can make it easier to pay big tech companies to sell your work back to you!". No thanks.

[–] halm@leminal.space 9 points 1 day ago

Making slop easier, more convenient and even more commonplace? Nope.

[–] Dr_Vindaloo@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

These comments are insane. I wonder if any of these people are actual software devs who have genuinely tried using a modern coding agent. Yes, there are issues with datacenters, investment bubble, circular financing, AI being used for discrimination and weaponry, etc. but those are problems of capitalism -- the tech itself is actually useful.

[–] Archr@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I have used an agent to try some test projects (this was about a year ago). I found that while the code did work for the most part, the agent overall produced code that was overly complex for what the initial brief asked of it. And that complexity made the code difficult to extend with even simple features.

I don't use one anymore because I figured that, for my job, maintainability is critical and I don't mind that the code takes me overall longer to write if it is well planned out and extendable.

Edit: I still would not use op's code since 1. It's not something I need, and 2. I don't trust it.

[–] LilyVess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's useful. It's useful enough that justify the economy, climate, actual living places, etc 's cost?

I don't think so honestly.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 4 points 20 hours ago

and dependency of a subscription to function

[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 day ago

Actually useful in accelerating all this.