202
LG smart TVs caught logging audio with screen off and snooping on local devices
(www.notebookcheck.net)
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
202 points (98.1% liked)
PC Master Race
22472 readers
318 users here now
A community for PC Master Race.
Rules:
- No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No NSFW content.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- Be thoughtful and helpful: especially when new beginners have questions.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
GDPR ... this sounds like it could be very expensive for LG if a consumer agency reports it
The thing is, it just isnt even a surprise anymore. In fact I'd be more surprised if these devices weren't doing this. What worries me is that the industry seems to think its acceptable and more often than not there are no consequences.
Shout-out Sceptre TVs. Probably the only one you can trust anymore
Can you still buy them? They've disappeared from Amazon in the last year or so.
I haven't personally looked
Regular monitors possible good route too if you don't need huge screens. And if you are a pc gamer then you at least get higher than the 120 hz cap lot of TVs come with these days, and the added benefit of it being a dumb panel.
1984 was taken as an instruction manual
Before buying a TV we researched what you can use without giving it internet access. Turns out that is quite a few. We got a Samsung and indeed we never had to, and just use it as a dumb screen
I haven't watched the Gamers Nexus video(they are the ones doing the research on this subject) yet, but according to their preview in their previous video, it seems they hinted at the fact that some tvs can access the internet even though you don't physically connect them.
I was also of the belief that if you just kept your smart tv dumb then it wouldn't be a problem, but it seems like that is not entirely true.
Oh damn, that's a long video... since we already have a TV I guess I won't be watching the entire thing.
I guess they could do that if they included a wireless modem in the TV. That would be kind of crazy though - companies don't make that much money off harvesting user data like this, so paying for a mobile connection would be surprising to me.
IIRC the user marketing data exfiltration method pioneered by Samsung several years ago involves a form of Bluetooth P2P/mesh networking whereby a TV with no internet connection can handshake with, for example, a neighbor’s TV which does have internet enabled or, if they’re just as tinfoil as you and disabled their internet, your data and theirs could simply be relayed to another neighbor’s TV on a different floor, etc etc
You've got to admire it on one level.
Hopefully they're too scared of the GDPR to try that shit here.
Yes, quite clever. No iron ring for the engineer, but I’m sure they were briefly proud of themselves.
That’s a good question re: gdpr. Regional activation of those modules in FW revision is certainly possible. But my guess is that the difference relates to the payload contents and whether or which PII is permitted by any particular local laws, since I expect that would maximize profits.
Kind of fascinating the whole tinfoil spying angle was about governments, but turns out even if governments didn't do it companies now have every incentive to do it to monetize your data.
I've got no cell reception inside, thanks to aluminum siding, but it's going to be annoying as fuck if I have to open up my next TV and figure out which circuit board traces are antennae or which chips are wireless.
sure, we've already got every other parallel between reality and fictional fascist dystopias that we've already had and I'm too lazy to list, why not telescreens, too. Let's build the Torment Nexus while we're at it, assuming AI isn't that already. Just go for broke, see what I care anymore. All hail ~~Big Brother~~ Lucky Goldstar.
If they do this in Europe, too, they are in for bad, bad times.