this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
1223 points (98.3% liked)

Murdered by Words

2540 readers
922 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Here, I'll give up all means of production that I personally own and aren't for personal use.

Done.

(Ok I'm not giving up my retirement account until we have an effective pension system because I'm not an idiot, but other than that done)

[–] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 9 points 13 hours ago

I’m scared for our society, nobody willing to actually educate themselves outside of social media

[–] ravelin@slrpnk.net 50 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Side note: Google is NOT your friend.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They're not really your friend either, just the enemy of your enemy for now.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

the story of tech

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] obvs@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Capitalism is LITERALLY forcing other people to give away all of their belongings.

In capitalism, you just don't have any remaining belongings to give away.

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 1 points 47 minutes ago

Capitalism is LITERALLY forcing other people to give away all of their belongings

can you explain this some? im not very knowledgeable about economic systems

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 23 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Ask your average blue collar Republican voter what they hate about socialism and they will perfectly describe capitalism

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 57 minutes ago

The average socialist describes socialism as a liberal, democratic, capitalist center left government.

People would lose their shit if the government started going after private ownership.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, wait... Jesus Christ literally said that. No, seriously. It was something like, "if you want to follow me, surrender your Earthly possessions" and "A thief cannot rob your ephemeral wealth, unlike stuff in your house." Paraphrased poorly, but that's the gist of it.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

That's what I was thinking. She didn't describe socialism, she described christinism. She probably hates it just the same.

[–] Denfa@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Socialism to a conservative: anything that benefits people I don’t like or don’t care about, with extra scrutiny when it’s POC; Capitalism to a conservative: Dammit I’m special and precious and nothing at all like the other 8 billion souls god saw fit to populate the earth with because I ✓ work ✓ go to church ✓ follow Fox News ✓ am white

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 24 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Google's my third biggest enemy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I mean the proof is in the pudding.

We can all see how the conservative "pull yourself up by your boostraps trickle down" ideology is (isn't) working for the majority of our society, including the vast majority of conservatives.

I'm not some tree hugging ultra-lib. But the bottom line is capitalism simply isn't sustainable. It causes rampant pollution and an ever-widening wealth gap between the haves and have nots. We haven't even been utilizing capitalism that long in the big picture and it's already absolutely catastrophic for our environment. It's just not sustainable. It needs to be HEAVILY regulated if it keeps existing at all. And one thing I know for absolute certain is you get the opposite of regulation when you hire conservatives/regressives.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Well if you hate Hitler's genocide, we shouldn't all have to collectively do something about it. Buy your own gun, get yourself to Germany, and start fighting Nazis yourself!"

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Well that is just it, the wealthy of the US were totally on board with the Nazi. Industrialists like Ford help to bankroll the Nazi Empire by building factories and saying they could keep all the profits. Not to mention IBM developing the number system for the tattoos on Jewish prisoners and helping with the logistics of sending them to the death camps

Hitler didn't even want to kill the Jews at first, he wanted to exile them and sent envoys to see if other countries would take them. When the wealthy of the US found out they went and lobbied against this and stroked more anti-jewish sentiment in Europe to ensure the final solution would happen. Hell, even Hitler said he based the Holocaust after the Native American genocide the US committed.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

US was fully onboard with eugenics leading up to WWII. There's a whole lotta retconning going on.

Not the least of it is that US were the heroes in WWII. We were "neutral" until the thing was half through, and even then barely even fought the Germans. History props America up, because one of our biggest exports is "history"...but we're the third-stringers who soaked up the glory when we finished the game 30 points up...while we were brought in with a couple minutes left and up by 50.

Us milennials are the worst of it. We got taught by boomer history teachers who heard endless exaggerated war stories from their dads and uncles and had that to feed their already stubborn attitudes. Or worse, Vietnam vets.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

For real, the US is the source of the fascism which pisses me off when people say the US stopped the fascists. They are the fucking fascist and Italy and Germany were offshoots from the US.

If the US citizens hadn't invested the time and money in the European Axis then perhaps WWII would have never happened. That is speculative, of course, but it really feels the US is responsible especially after walking away from governance in the aftermath of WWI. I digress though.

You are absolutely correct as the Soviet Union did all the heavy lifting taking on around 80 percent of the Nazi forces. It was definitely the undoing of Germany when they attacked Russia, but if they hadn't we may be living in a far worse world for minorities than we have now. Unfortunately, it feels like thanks to the US spreading fascism around the world we are heading there anyways.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That isn't what socialism is, but it is however exactly what Jesus told people to do. And yet she - a Christian - seems to hold the idea in contempt. Curious.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 4 points 18 hours ago

Google is a private entity known for problematic practices and associations.

This being said: a decade of underfunded education and propaganda-driven social media bubbles made many people unbelievably sociopathic in their worldview.

load more comments
view more: next ›