this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
157 points (99.4% liked)

Fuck AI

8115 readers
4219 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A group of ill-prepared climbers had to be rescued because Gemini told them climbing Mt. Shasta would only take 8 hours.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Don't even rely on it to plan inconsequential stuff, like an appliance purchase. It'll hallucinate all kinds of crazy features it doesn't have. I tried to use it to compare dishwasher models when I needed a new one. What a cluster fuck of wrong information and wasted time that was.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Wat? WHAT? Ive not climbed anything close to shasta, we dont even have peaks that high where i live but im much much more responsible when planning. Who even goes "uhh yeah 6 hours sounds about right" to a peak above 4k??? I mean sure i can climb 4000 meters elevation in 6 hours, thats about my pace but you also have to get down and i imagine those are not easy trails. All if this is so stupid especially since they were climbers cause tou are not just climbing that high randomly, youd give up much faster but that means these idiots climbed stuff successfully before which is insane.

[–] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

It took them 16 hours just to reach the summit. That was already 7PM on August 30, way past the recommended turnaround time of 12PM

Not sure what kind of "climbers" they are, but I would have known a long time before then that their plans were going off the rails.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 28 points 19 hours ago

PSA: Don't rely on AI ~~to plan anything that could put your life at risk... like a mountain climb - Engadget~~

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 35 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Honestly I hate AI with a burning passion. It's the stupidest shit on earth. Except for these climbers.

Because it's their own fucking fault. I don't even think we can blame AI for this one.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 20 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Wow this seems an jncredibly stupid show, and teenage viewers will believe it works as shown and not staged

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago

Exactly, this is sooooo dangerous for the mentally damaged people that follow MrBeast

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Good. Hopefully he dies out there because of it. He won't, because it's staged as hell but a man can dream.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
  • "Hey Google is this edible?" [showing an out of focus, blurry image]
  • "This is definitely edible, you can feast on that"
  • "It is bitter, are you sure about that?"
  • "Yes, it's definitely edible, you can eat that"
  • "I am dizzy, and by comparing pictures on a book it seems to be poisonous????"
  • "You're absolutely right! I accidentally confused that for another root. I will take note to do better next time"

[dies]

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 5 points 20 hours ago

that is the result of listening to corporations

[–] the_q@piefed.social 7 points 20 hours ago

Stupid humans tend to be the reason for a lot of the issues plaguing the planet.

[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

People dying because they blindly followed the advice of an LLM is kind of like natural selection.

I assume the selection will become more rapid as the consequences of cognitive offloading begin to manifest.

[–] AlcoholicPenis@futurology.today 2 points 14 hours ago

Agreed. Honestly should let it happen. People that stupid will hurt us as a species.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 15 hours ago

Both things can be true

[–] luipaard0011@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago

Darwin always wins

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 21 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The slop did not account for the slope

(sorry)

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago (2 children)
[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago

Sloppery slope

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 1 points 19 hours ago

Ouch, way better than mine.

[–] schroedingersKoala@piefed.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

How many drugs over what time-frame does one have to take to think this would be a good idea?
I despair at humanity.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The article doesn't mention it, but I sure hope they were billed for the rescue.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

In my European country, mountain rescue is billed thousands of euro and it's not free, if it was due to stupidity

I can't imagine a 20 hour search+rescue being free in the land of the Free

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

This is actually an area that America is generally pretty good at i.e. rescues by the US Park Service are generally free, unless there's obvious gross intelligence.

Personally, I would consider using AI to plan a trip for multiple people as gross negligence, but considering this current government's position on AI, I suspect they weren't charged a penny for it.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca -1 points 14 hours ago

No, bad taxpayer! Bad!

[–] AlcoholicPenis@futurology.today 2 points 16 hours ago

AI bros should do that more. If they do natural selection will kick in and take care of the problem for us.