this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
313 points (98.2% liked)

politics

31022 readers
2555 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The senior Democratic congressman James Clyburn said his decision to support Clarence Thomas for a US supreme court seat “was a mistake” and called for the expansion of the nation’s highest legal panel to 13 justices.

Clyburn, of South Carolina, spoke up for Thomas at his fiery 1991 confirmation hearings, calling him “a personal and professional friend” who would use their shared experiences lifting minorities and advancing civil rights to become a respected and accomplished jurist.

Instead, Clyburn told NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday, Thomas abandoned his principles to become an extremist, hard-right member of a bench that has delivered some stunning legal reversals in recent years, including the overturning of federal protections for abortion and ending affirmative action in higher education.

Asked by host Kristen Welker if he regretted standing up for Thomas, Clyburn replied: “I have made mistakes in my life, and that’s one that I made. And I will own up to that mistake.

...

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 122 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Motherfucker, Anita Hill was there and you ignored her. Any regrets you have that don't involve apologies to her and resigning are meaningless.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Biden was the one who promised Hill she would have a chance to speak and then didnt let her. He led Thomas's confirmation hearing.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Biden was the one who promised Hill she would have a chance to speak and then didnt let her. ~~He led Thomas's confirmation hearing.~~

Bent over backwards to bury the accusations and get Thomas confirmed. FTFY

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 days ago

He even supported Biden who was also happy to throw anything negative of Thomas away

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Fuck you Clyburn. The signs were there, you fucking knew. You don't get to clear your conscience when Death is knocking. I hope you regret the harm you've caused with your dying breath.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 42 points 3 days ago

He never had principles, as evidenced by testimony about how he's a rapist during his confirmation. They all fucking knew exactly what he was.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Clyburn has always been a "third way" centrist hack who judges bills by how "bipartisan" they are. If he had a chance to do the same vote over again today he'd still vote to install Thomas.

He's just campaigning right now. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/south-carolina-rep-jim-clyburn-will-run-for-an-18th-term

I'm sure after he said that he phoned Thomas and apologized on the downlow.

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago

A lot of neoliberals are suddenly going to start "supporting" what they used to call too extreme, but it's just because they're hoping to retain their seats and toss out enough breadcrumbs the movement doesn't have enough momentum for real change.

Leave the current SC on the bench for 40 years and adding a couple to balance them out isn't the solution.

We need a way to remove the rot, not just throw more apples on top of the rot.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

I have no doubt they share a meaning of what uplifting minorities means, even today. Fuck them both

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

You wanted to cash the bribe checks, but you don’t want to live with the consequences? Pathetic selfish loser.

[–] ilickfrogs@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Should be age limits too. Every other country figured that out....

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 2 points 3 days ago

Should not be for life, either. It should be a set amount of time. e.g. 4 years, or whatever. No one should get a job for the rest of their life, with next to no way to remove them.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Clyburn has always been a gigantic piece of shit.

Same then as he is now.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago

"It was a mistake." In this case translates to "I knew what I was doing, but I don't want to be held responsible."

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Took the money when it mattered, then had a crisis of conscience late in life. Typical. Fuck this guy, too.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Nawww, really?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Too bad that shithead is there for life.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago

Yeah he got his and got his kids theirs. What's he want? A mulligan? Little late for a do-over.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago

He also backed pro life POS Cuellar in Texas

[–] SaltyAmerican@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thats only 1 of 3 current Republican SCOTUS justices given to us by the DNC

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 days ago

They tried to make it 4 with Merrick Garland.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Also water is wet

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 days ago

The man who has been the most wrong on every case?! No, you're being too hard on yourself.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Another justice right now is just another trump appointed lacky

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca -5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He should apologize for his support of biden and harris, and clinton surely before.

Fuck you James, sorry, but you are the fucking problem here.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

Something about birds of a feather.