This kind of thing just fuels the anti-science conservative agenda. Knock it off.
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
58 points (80.9% liked)
Space
2608 readers
95 users here now
A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics
Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instanceβs local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.
Related Communities
π Science
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !space@beehaw.org
π Engineering
π Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Explain
if you wanna call Pluto a a planet, do it. The IAU is not going to arrest you or something.
Don't believe this person, I said it was a planet and spent 5years locked away in the planetarium
That sounds awesome. Did you get to look at all the exhibits?
And the sun is flat. Fight me.
It is known.
You think the sun is flat?
Bro... The UNIVERSE is flat.
It's true
The argument that Pluto would be a planet if it were in a different orbital track is pretty disingenuous, because in a different orbital track it might also be a moon of Jupiter or just flung out into interstellar space.
I think the argument was more of proposing that the definition of its own orbital track is not informative of anything of the body itself but instead only of what is surrounding the object. The argument seems to be an extension of the planetary scientist school of thought (definition of planet should describe planet) vs the astronomical side (name describes motion/in relation to its surroundings)
Yeah, and if my grandma had a weener, she'd have been my grandpa.
Either we now have to learn like 21 planets in elementary school (hard) or Pluto gets a technical demotion (easy).
Pluto is still a planet in all our hearts, this is just humanities constant march of trying to become more and more accurate and precise with time
Pluto is still a planet in all our hearts
My heart pumps blood. My brain does the thinking. Pluto is not a planet. So what? It's still fascinating.
Pluto and Charon are tidally locked, meaning they always face each other as they orbit around. Romanticizing a bit, they are like dancers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bU5pQWQRxak
I'm your moon, you're my moon,
We go round and round.
From out here, it's the rest of the world that looks so small.
Promise me you will always remember who you are.
Labels can be helpful for categorizing, organizing our knowledge. Labels do not define us. We're all space stuff.
Pluto and Charon are tidally locked
To clarify, they're mutually tidally locked, which is what's rare
This is the song let me forgive science for what they did to Pluto. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wrJ6_GAprFE
Teaching the dwarf planets could be fun, though. What about thebfact that Pluto and Charon orbit one another, and how you could build a space elevator directly from.the surface of one to.the other?
load more comments
(9 replies)
More recently, the campaign has taken on a populist tinge, with Trumpβs Nasa administrator, Jared Isaacman, telling a congressional committee in April that he was in favour of a rethink. βI am very much in the camp of Make Pluto a Planet Again,β he said.
I think this says all that needs to be said about it.
Oh, so just another faux-populist distraction. I don't even see the epstein files comments anymore here
load more comments
(1 replies)
no. I really wish non scientists would stay out of details like what is actual medicine or classification of astronimical objects.
I'm no scientist, but it's a pretty obvious no if you understand the reason it's no longer considered a planet.
oh yeah and me to but I have been technically a scientist at times. Still many people can understand it but some I don't think even want to. They want to hand wave it away and go with their feelings about what should be a planet.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Oh, plutodrama is still going on. What is the current definition of planet?
Orbits the sun, has enough gravity to form a sphere and has cleared it's orbit. It's the clearing the orbit part where Pluto fails, as do Ceres, Haumea, Makemake, and Eris. And also Quaoar, Orcus, Ixion, Varuna, Sedna, Gonggong, Salacia, Varda, Hygiea and Vesta. They all orbit in basically an asteroid field.
load more comments
(16 replies)
Pluto in a tiny squeaky voice: "yes"
Betteridge, in a Doctor Manhattan voice: "No."
Trump is literally just doing sitcom bits now
Everyone forgets Pallas.
The raven remembers
More recently, the campaign has taken on a populist tinge, with Trumpβs Nasa administrator, Jared Isaacman, telling a congressional committee in April that he was in favour of a rethink. βI am very much in the camp of Make Pluto a Planet Again,β he said.
Did anyone ask Ann Francis?
view more: next βΊ