this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
310 points (98.7% liked)

Greentext

8696 readers
629 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 76 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

The scene is cut in a way that you don't know for sure they aren't paying him. They're probably pretty loyal, long-time customers given the way they all run right there after school, so he can take it on the honors system that they'll pay for what they're taking. (And he's probably able to keep track of it pretty well on his own given he knows their names and preferred candies by heart.)

As for the candy he throws aimlessly into the crowd, I'm sure he can afford to blow some pennies' worth of money on customer retention by literally throwing candy at them.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 62 points 4 days ago

The Candy Man can cause he mixes it with savvy business practices and loss leaders, and makes the world taste goooood!

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 47 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I suspect the rich kids had a line of credit where he’d just send the parents a bill at the end of the month. My understanding is many grocers used to operate that way, especially before credit cards.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yep. My aunt got in trouble for exactly this when she was a child. Abused the grocery line of credit all summer getting unnecessary candy for herself and her siblings.

[–] wieson@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

The shopkeeper is partly to blame. Where I'm from, nowadays, there are laws about age of purchase. 7 and older you can buy small stuff that are reasonable for a child to be buying with their pocket money (vendors' common sense is needed here). 14 and older they can fully buy stuff on their own (except for age restricted items obvs).

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it's a demonstration of classism in england. The rich kids get things for free, the poor have to pay.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

because being rich is good and should be rewarded and being poor is bad and should be punished.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Prosperity gospel in one sentence

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Man, that shit is a one-way ticket to the heater. Basically, “I reject JC/I embrace ~~Mammon~~materialism” and it’s not going to pay out after their body mortgage comes due.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

A lot of it is mangled with new-age-ism

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 67 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Rich people get things for free or as gifts all the time. Meanwhile us peasants have to pay.

[–] FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 days ago

On Epstein’s island

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 days ago

The difference in building a loyal customer base vs expelling unwanted low lifes

Excepted return of investment

PR vs hand outs

CAPITALISM!

[–] shellington@piefed.zip 19 points 3 days ago

I always assumed they paid a monthly subscription.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The shop keeper is just prejudiced. Charlie's four grandparents are in a long-term polycule together. Charlie is the result of an insane two-generation long plan to get all members of the polycule to have a single genetic child together. The polycule has been completely open to the whole town about this plan, and everyone knows it.

The shopkeeper isn't prejudiced against the poor. He just has sexual hangups. And he's projecting his bigotry onto an innocent young child that had no choice but to be part of this whole situation.

[–] BrickEater@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This would imply the polycule either groomed their children into predetermined relationship to have Charlie. Or their kids got into a semi-incestous second generation poly relationship which resulted in Charlie.

Either way there's some odd moral implications....

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Either way there’s some odd moral implications…

Aka, it's Charlie and the Chocolate Factory!

[–] phonics@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

He clocks a kid with the vertical swinging counter door in the movie too. Pretty sure he gets a kickback from the local dentist. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8Lvn5H0kHw&t=20

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago

Drug dealer, Charlie doesn't have any money.

[–] LemmyUser0909@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

This guy and uncle joe are two peas in a pod...

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Help those who help themselves. That plus it was prolly no secret in the town the disability fraud the grandfather was pulling.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone -2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

What even is this? Did they racebend the Candyman?

[–] pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s from Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago

I must have only read the books! This guy looks creepy AF.

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Chocolate factory Candyman not Cabrini Green Candyman

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Children's entertainment, not horror.