this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
1706 points (99.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

12102 readers
2638 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hayvan@piefed.world 211 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Also also corporations fought the science for about a decade until safer alternatives were developed.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 164 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Proof that corporations will fuck over the entire planet and its entire population and all the animals and plant life just to make mOnEy during their lifetime. Selfish as FUCK.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 43 points 4 days ago (8 children)

It isn't even about the money, it's about the power and the game. They're addicted to the pursuit of power and corporate structures feed that addiction.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yeah they don't give a shit about money, they just need to win and everybody else needs to lose.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] rayyy@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

These people NEVER give up their power unless it is taken from them or they cease to exist.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rain_enjoyer@sopuli.xyz 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Also also also the same corporations changed process to make new stuff and change didn't require them to go out of business. i can elaborate if anyone wants to

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And don’t forget that Tetraethyl Lead was only used as an anti-knock agent because the GM wasn’t able to patent and monetise Benzene.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Overspark@piefed.social 124 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Also the hole is still there, but it's slowly healing now instead of getting worse.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That's the problem with stupid people. When there's a crisis and people solve it they just go "see there wasn't a serious crisis", and next time they go "nothing happened last time, it's exaggerated"

[–] Darkonion@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

You are only allowed to fix things if you don't tell people you are fixing them and most critically don't tell them what it will cost. The problem occurs when someone aware and nefarious seeks power they can point out all the 'expensive and worthless' things that were done by their opponents. We now all live in 'the problem occurs' time period.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Same thing with acid rain. Remember acid rain? When was the last time you heard someone fear mongering about acid rain? Doesn't really happen anymore, because we passed policies reducing the sulfur content in highway and maritime fuels. Less sulfur being emitted into the atmosphere means less sulfuric acid is formed in clouds meaning the rain is less acidic. We did it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 51 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

Matt Walsh is an unserious goon at best, an actual moron at worst.

But the reason that this sort of anti-science propaganda might actually work on well- intended people is because we don't advertise our major successes anymore. Or rather, we never really did advertise them enough, but as those successes became less visible compared to, say, a polio vaccine, just as it took scientists to inform us of the problem, they need to inform us of wins too.

When I was a kid in the 90s, we had a lot of alarm bells going off about the Ozone Layer, about acid rains, and climate change (termed "global warming" then). None of these were particularly visible problems to most people. Each of these became massively politicized, but the fix for the first 2 was a relatively narrow remedy: find and implement replacements for hydroflourocarbons through environmental regulations, and cut mainly two compounds, sulfer dioxide and nitrogen oxides, from fossil fuel power plant emissions through cap and trade regulation policies and smokestack scrubbers. And it worked quite well, to the point that the ozone layer is repairing, as are ecosystems previously ravaged by acid rains.

But scientists and the media never advertised that success nearly enough. Honestly we should have been politicizing that success, even, as much as we did the problems. Now it just seems to most like the problem quietly got forgotten like it never really mattered, rather than that it was a massive problem and we fucking fixed it through science, regulation and international cooperation. And that apparent disappearance of the problem without any noticeable change for the average Joe, and the resulting skepticism that it was ever a problem at all, has infected the one ongoing problem, the biggest and most complex of the problems, climate change.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The COVID vaccine was called a miracle and praised but was quickly squashed by the antivaxers. 🤷

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 56 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah.

This is like when people bitch and complain about a pothole and suddenly when the pothole is fixed? Silence.

/S

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 4 days ago

Yeah?

But what about Y2K? All those programmers and companies stressed over it and nothing happened! /s

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I thought someone shot Matt Walsh in the neck? Oh wait it was the other guy identical to him in every aspect that matters

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 39 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This phenomenon is a flaw in broad (group) human reasoning, and it needs a name so that we can stop the generational backslide that comes from new people coming along and undoing all progress.

[–] PrimePathPioneer@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Hollywood has really geared us for the trope of “You can’t stop Phase 1”. Act 1, the hero tells the world about an impending supervillain. No one believes him. Act 2, the supervillain arrives and takes over the world, their rampage unstopped and made totally evident to all. Act 3, the hero comes up with an alternate plan that can be engineered in a day to defeat the villain after their arrival.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 4 days ago

Also called "We can't close the beach for some sharks, it's peak season"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

Same thing happened with vaccines.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 25 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That's the problem when you live in an information bubble. I clearly remember reports about the ozon layer starting regenerating.

Why do idiots and ignorants still have that much influence? That's the real mystery!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I had to learn about this stuff to get my refrigerant certification. If you want to claim that CFCs aren’t that big of a deal then you are a fucking dumbass.

1 atom of chlorine can destroy 100,000 atoms of ozone. For every 1 part of chlorine that enters the atmosphere 100,000 times that amount of ozone is destroyed. Not only that, it also absorbs and traps infrared and other types of radiation heat and stops it from escaping the atmosphere. That is just one of the elements in CFCs and they all do severe levels of damage, they aren’t very stable so they break down easy and ever atom of its compound gets to interact to it’s full effect. Shit’s really bad.

[–] rain_enjoyer@sopuli.xyz 15 points 4 days ago (13 children)

i think i'm qualified as a chemist

as far as ozone goes, CFCs are bad, HCFCs are less bad but still bad, bromine is even worse, iodine would be worse than bromine but also it's expensive and the only compound that would be slightly useful would be CF3I which decomposes very quickly. so we can actually maybe see it used in the future, because it's basically fine

as far as GHG potential goes, the thing that is important are C-F bonds, these bonds do the IR absorption, and how fast that thing decomposes. if you introduce weak bonds decomposition is faster, a lot. C-F bonds are very strong, C-Cl a bit less but we don't want to do that. C-H are okayish, any double bond is also weak. so this is why CFCs and PFCs are very bad, because they last very long. HFCs are a maybe, not good enough so some are getting phased out now, with less fluorine these get flammable too. and HFOs degrade fast, so they're basically fine but also are expensive

the more C-F bonds and the less C-H bonds we have the less flammable thing gets, but also more stable, and by the time things get flammable it just makes more sense to switch to hydrocarbons. there are some very niche mixes that would comply with GHG requirements and are nonflammable but very few people actually need it and maybe they'll get waivers anyway

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, since it did not work as well. It was proto good. A hipster of a convention that needed a follow up by a real Canadian one, with teeth and brawn and chiseled good looks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] siravious@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The orange idiot would still call it a hoax

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Pretty sure he outright has. He also implied that his fucking building was air tight. Ya know I wonder if it hurts to be that fucking stupid.

[–] Master_Suck@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It kills to be that stupid. However we live in a time where being stupid is no longer a mortal threat. Human medicine is just too good.

An anti-nazi philosopher wrote about stupidity.

...evil, at least, understands itself. It knows what it's doing. Stupidity, on the other hand, is often blind, self-satisfied, and utterly impervious to reason.

The laws of Nature used to sort these morons out. Sucks we haven't figured out a replacement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I remember he was ones complaining that you can't open the windows on aircraft, so it wouldn't surprise me.

I think the airtight building thing was him not understanding the difference between airtight and positive pressure. His building had positive pressure, if it did also been airtight it would have exploded.

[–] Droechai@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 4 days ago

I really like to sleep in airtight spaces when my asthma makes me sensitive to smells, so I pull a plastic bag over my head as I go to bed.

Maybe Trump could try that technique? Its more certain than trying to airtight the whole building

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Man different times. Imagine if this happened now.

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Countries passing regulation for a common good? Sounds too woke for me!

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago

There'd be lots more 80s hair to battle the woke ideal.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ever seen all the news about renewable power growing exponentially? No? It's because good news is boring and noone has agenda to propagate it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We need to bring back bullying, but just for people like Matt Walsh

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 13 points 4 days ago

Funny story too. They had a bounty system, you got paid for bringing in the cfc's to get rid of them. So manufacturers started quiet;y making it just to trade it in.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)

There's still a hole, which is why NZ is melanoma capital of the world.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Matt Walsh is a walking trashcan lid flapping in the wind.

[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The ozone layer: maya hi, maya hu, maya ho, maya ha ha

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mio@feddit.nu 9 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Do it will climate change - now.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This is one of the very few instances where every country agreed on something

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›