this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
820 points (98.6% liked)

Work Reform

17675 readers
1352 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 74 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Go into debt?! How so?

We only spend $700+/mo ($8,400 annual) for our family of 4, with $4500 deductibles per person and a family max out of pocket of $15,000... Is that not affordable for everyone?

/s in case it wasn't abundantly clear...

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I had a max out of network out of pocket of $5k and insurance told me after my surgery that it didn't count because they didn't have a contract with where I went. So basically they needed to be in network to count towards out of network? $28k later they said they miscalculated and I owed another $14k I told them I'm living in a different country now so try and get it and they dropped the extra amount

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

$28k later they said they miscalculated and I owed another $14k

Who did? The insurance or the healthcare provider? Cause why the fuck would the insurance company tell you that you owe them money after they didn't cover the healthcare expenses that you were paying for a plan for them to cover?

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So this is a bit of a complicated thing that I admittedly still don't fully understand and I did word it a bit wrong. I paid a bunch of money to the hospital/surgery, insurance reimbursed them, hospital reimbursed me, insurance said woopsies we reimbursed too much, the hospital paid back that amount to insurance, then the hospital asked me for money. I told insurance and the hospital tough fucking titties they better figure it out because they're not getting that money back.

I was originally told I would pay the hospital, then I would hit my out of network out of pocket max, the hospital would be reimbursed the full amount after my max, then the hospital would reimburse me. I got fucked from both sides and eventually their woopsie was my "I have enough money to fight you but nobody wants that because even if you win you have to get it from me across the world" so they folded

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] johan@feddit.nl 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm not from the US. Do you know how much of your income tax goes to the health care system?

I live in the Netherlands and we actually have a pretty weird system of private insurance companies, but they're not allowed to make a profit and it's mandatory to have insurance. Anyway, my partner and I together pay about €300 per month, which actually doubled is about what you pay for 4 people (though for kids here it's free).

Copay is not a thing here. The legal minimum deductible is €385 per year. You can raise it to max €885 and then you pay less for insurance every month. I have the max deductible, my partner has the lowest.

$4500 seems like an insane amount! I have never reached that or even gotten close. The government here sets the limit for deductibles and that's always a big political discussion. There's some talks now of removing the deductible altogether, though that would mean raising taxes elsewhere.

How do deductibles even work in the US? I had my appendix removed and here you then never pay anything because it's like a life threatening thing. I think you do pay for things like medicine and the ambulance ride until you reach your deductible, but for things like going to the GP or life saving surgery it's just covered.

And here if you're not working or earn less than certain thresholds it becomes cheaper or free. But isn't that similar in the US, like medicaid or something?

I pay quite a lot of income tax too of course which also partially goes to the health care system. I think it's actually quite expensive here for people who have a reasonable income. If you don't earn anything it's mostly free but you still have plenty of health related costs like the deductible but also stuff that isn't automatically included with insurance like dental care.

Last question: what do you mean by "max out of pocket $15000"? Is that like your combined max deductible for your family?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

as a single person no, but if you earn enough to pay that its feasible. also different insurance have different types of coverage. employee seems superior to individually bought plans(often dont cover much for major stuff like emergencies, or surgeries)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

27 million with no coverage, the rest with extremely poor coverage.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 20 points 1 month ago

also theres a "limbo" in between medicaid and decent insurance, too much income for eligible medicaid insurance and not enough for decent insurance(enough where you do pay out the behind for emergencies, surgeries and hospitals, the largest cost)

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

What? Paying a mortgage payment monthly for the privilege of having a $10,000 deductible isn't good enough?

[–] meat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And how many millions more Americans effectively have no access due to poverty and high copays?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

about 15+million and many more or underinsured. dental care is another problem too(only recently like in the last 7ish years they started covering for basic dental surgeries and partialy for major work(like root canals) and only for select dentists that actually accept medical, most dont.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago

Even if you have health and dental insurance, actually getting coverage can be a nightmare in some scenarios.

Tooth infection spreading into the jaw? Health insurance says it's a dental issue, denied. Dental insurance says it's a medical issue, denied. Both of them refuse to talk directly to each other -- they will only communicate with you, asking you to pass messages to the other one, which the other one will ignore. Every time you try to contact either one, you need to be prepared to spend at least two hours on the phone, most of it waiting on hold.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As a Canadian, I do want to point out that it's not enough to be above the united states, considering how their bar is dropping lower and lower.

I am very thankful for our existing healthcare system, and I want to see people protect it against the american inspired groups that are trying to privatize parts of it.

There are also areas where we were originally SUPPOSED to have coverage based on the original plan decades ago (ex. pharmaceuticals, homecare, dental), but those phases never got implemented.

[–] nikt@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As an also-Canadian I’ll chime in here to say that there are definitely people in this country without health insurance coverage. If you’re here as a non-resident, you typically don’t have government insurance and are subject to out-of-pocket billing. I believe there are about half a million people in Ontario in this situation, not sure about other provinces.

I know the OP was supposed to be rhetorical, and I agree that the American healthcare is an embarrassment — but the reality of healthcare administration is complicated, and I’m not sure dumbing it down like this is all that helpful.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, this is inaccurate, at least for Germany. Although health insurance is technically mandatory in Germany, there are over 50k citizens that are uninsured, not 0

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Interesting. How are they uninsured? If they go to get care are they turned away or have to pay more?

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago

https://www.aerzteblatt.de/archiv/menschen-ohne-krankenversicherung-ein-oft-uebersehenes-problem-0f03a705-055c-4855-9a36-d06040aef11f

It happens if people don't pay their health insurance for more than 3 months in a row, and yes, they will get turned away by doctors unless they are willing to pay their entire treatment cost out of pocket.

[–] ItsLucky@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago

As far as I understand it nost of these people are jobless, not on welfare and can't pay the amount of money the insurence wants them to pay. Oh and also above 25 years old or without parenta as otherwise you could get insurance over them.

[–] fiat_lux@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I see more of the world watching in horror than I see laughing.

[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Plenty are laughing and cheering at all the suffering because we "deserve it"

You see it plenty in comments here on lemmy.

[–] Supercrunchy@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I am sorry to hear you think everybody abroad enjoys your suffering, but I think you are getting the wrong impression from lemmy (which does not represent the average people). I admit that it's often hard to feel sympathetic towards someone who voted for what's coming to them, because believing in karma feels good. But I do also feel pity for all the people that are struggling economically or are getting deported without fault.

If you meet normal (=not from lemmy) people abroad you will find that most will want a very hardline stance against the US as a country, wishing to punish the US administration even more for all the wars and hostile behavior, while also be very welcoming to any US person that want to escape that hell.

I wish you the best in changing the system there, but unfortunately I fear there's at least 2 more years (likely more) of things becoming worse and worse ahead of us.

PS: upvoted because I think you are not alone in your feeling, and it's something worth discussing.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 6 points 1 month ago

I think about a third of the US does not actively deserve it. The rest is either actively fucking with lives in other countries or accept it as either inevitable or as "cost of doing business", with no intention to change anything. Did you know there is a national census about the percentage of people in the US who can get rekt in my view and the view of many others? It's called "presidential elections".

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 6 points 1 month ago

because we “deserve it”

As an American myself ... yes, we (collectively) deserve it. A lot of the people suffering from this are exactly the same people who voted against fixing it in every fucking election.

[–] neutronbumblebee@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

Political reform is tough, no doubt but it can be done and has been elsewhere. Also no better time than the present while the worst problems are so clearly visible.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (7 children)

We subsidize Israel’s government through military. The money they save helps pay for them to have socialized healthcare.

That needs to be the message.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That should not be the message. Socialized health care is cheaper by far than the premium-on-health model that you're using in the United States.

It's the same argument that Republicans have been using to extract concessions from Canada and Europe: "look at these freeloaders, they won't pay their fair share for defense (read: they don't buy enough American weapons) and they use the money for socialized health care, we ought to teach them a lesson."

The truth is that defense or foreign aid isn't in the same league as health care. You're giving Israel about 7 billion a year, and don't get me wrong - that's a lot and you should stop it. But you're spending 5.3 trillion on health care. Meanwhile, the record-setting defense budget for 2026 is 718 billion - and interestingly the vast majority of that budget is actually socialized health care! It's 441 billion going to the Department of Veterans Affairs.

With socialized health care, you could pay a lot less. And I hope you'd use the money for literally anything other than war.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

they get alot more from us than just military aid

loads and loads of tax breaks/special exceptions to make doing business with them more lucrative than anywhere else.

special exceptions that make it incredibly easy for them to tap into the wild west that is US financial markets etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] distal@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago (10 children)

This is not completely true the countries that have zeros have tons of people who are not covered. Take a look at the map on this website.

Even with single-payer healthcare, which is commonly considered optimal for understandable reasons, hospitals, clinics and other services may be privatised and or are subject to severe budget cuts.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's only one shithole on this list

[–] distal@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

UK, Germany, Canada and France have high homelessness rates. Partly because disability pay is low and healthcare costs are minimally made up for. Those in ill health may not be able to find work and land on the streets. These countries do nothing substantial like building housing and implementing pro-tenant reforms to stop it. This is not to say that healthcare is bad, I think healthcare must be socialised like postal services and the fire brigade, but it's not at all straight forward.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So those are like pissholes?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Technically, Ireland doesn't have free healthcare either, but it's government subsidised and most people still have free healthcare for most cases.

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I am amazed it's only 27 million. If they could, they would charge all 340 million Americans and all immigrants yet to nationalize, and give no service at all. Which is their obvious aim. Charge for being alive.

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

I live in the U.S. and I have "health insurance" from my employer (over 200k employees worldwide and billions in profit). My contribution to my health insurance premiums is around $4500 per year (I think). The last four years I have hit my deductible for at least one family member and out of pocket maximum. I am fortunate that I have been able to afford the roughly $20k per year that I have been spending on health care, but it has wrecked my ability to save or do anything else.

So I guess my point is that I believe that 27M uninsured dramatically understates the scale of the US healthcare crisis. I feel like the political elite are so far out of touch that they hear a story like mine and think "$20k? That's like a nice bottle of wine, what's the problem?" It's been devastating to my finances and by virtually any definition, I am in the working rich. Most people absolutely could not afford $20k per year. I am hoping next year will be better, but devastating medical bills are inevitable for most of us, and our socialized medicine is administered through the bankruptcy courts.

For profit insurance is pure exploitation.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Republicans for the most part don't care what anyone else thinks of them. They are full of the certain knowledge that they are the center of the universe and nothing outside that rotting circle matters.

[–] sanzky@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

being honest a lot of those countries lack universal healthcare. And by universal I mean everyone, including migrants without papers.

[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Japan is not technically correct. One is required to have healthcare coverage, but some people skirt the law and don't. We also pay at point of service, pay for prescriptions, etc. This is on top of paying for insurance (though your company may offer insurance that it pays some/all of). There are tax procedures once medical out-of-pocket reaches 100k JPY in a year and a way to reduce/eliminate further cost.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] antianarchist@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How is it in North Korea? Like seriously. I start to believe even they have a better health care system

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I believe there’s a documentary out there from years back; journalists got an invite in and snuck cameras. The hospitals used old beer bottles for IV.

Edit: was it this? https://youtu.be/eLCdsXRiouE

Edit 2: https://youtu.be/GLdqtwWOD9E @2:30

[–] antianarchist@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So still better than the US, that’s what I am saying.

Jokes aside, if the beer bottles work, why not. Can be sterilized easily. And still better than no IV.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These aren't any republicans, these are the rich ones with not enough imagination to think of anything but other people's sexual preferences.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu 2 points 1 month ago

Not laughing. Crying

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I know this is a tough pill for americans to swallow. But lots of countries does not allow trans-athletes to compete in the women's class.

The international organisation for track and field, and also the IOK have already said that transathletes are not allowed to compete with women (for now).

Though I absolutely agree that US politicians are experts at exaggerating and trying to blow the smallest issue out of proportion for headlines.

And it's sad the American people are too uneducated to see through the charade.

I would laugh at the US, if it wasnt for the fact that people's lives are ruined forever on a daily basis.

load more comments
view more: next ›