this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
852 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

88162 readers
2433 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Get your shortnames while the getting's good.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 376 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Lol. It'd be hilarious if this succeeded. It was so dumb of Musk to change the name.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 208 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Most of what musk does is dumb.

[–] RaoulDuke25@lemmy.dbzer0.com 106 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

He didn't get rich from being smart.

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 95 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

I assume he got rich how most people get rich, luck and being a sociopath.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 82 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

also having a lot of money to start out with helps

[–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 43 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

And an apartheid era emerald mine

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] n4ch1sm0@piefed.social 37 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And also by being a vaporware scam artist. Thunderf00t on YouTube has a whole collection of videos showcasing Musk's whole repertoire of bullshit.

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

yea..... that's pretty much all Thunderfoot posts about nowadays.... he hella fell off, for multiple reasons. But like, a decade ago he used to talk about scam kickstarters, atheism, interesting science topics, etc. And then in those debunking science videos he would bring the math and receipts that made it fun to watch... But then in the past 5 years it's just been Elon... nearly every video is about Elon. It's obsessive.

And tbf, that's not the only ick around Thunderfoot. I mean, he did kinda get his start during the Anti-SJW culture war shit doing anti-femisist ragebait videos. Basically occupied the same spaces as Sargon, Bearing and GradeAunderA.... and he's never really "grown" out of that, or addressed it, let alone apologized for it. He harps on Elon, and sometimes Trump/AlexJones/StevenCrowder but he's never really talked about how he and his ilk helped bring them about.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 253 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (26 children)

I hope this takes off and people start using "tweet" and "twitter" again and it makes "x" completely irrelevant like his Hitler salute should have

Edit: it cost $20 to join?! I'm out

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 172 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Edit: it cost $20 to join?! I’m out

Well, they need something to pay the lawyers with once Musk takes notice.

Edit: I've just discovered this interesting concept called "reading the article" and found out that they've already been sued, though it's still not entirely settled.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 121 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I’ve just discovered this interesting concept called “reading the article”

Spread the word my brother! You've got to let everyone know about this new fad!

[–] artyom@piefed.social 34 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I read it but honestly, probably 80% of the time I do not. Because articles are very often full of pop ups and ads and tracking and paywalls, and are unnecessarily verbose (most can be summarized in 1-2 sentences), and are just republishing someone else's work while adding nothing, and simultaneously devoid of useful information or any actual sources.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] zeezee@slrpnk.net 80 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

https://twitter.now/

vibe coded slop asking for $20 bucks to sign up.. i think I'm okay

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 49 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Edit: it cost $20 to join?! I’m out

They probably need the money to pay for their AI-based "fact-checking":

A new and notable feature is the automated fact-checking tool, a Gemini-based “veracity engine for real-time analysis” (“Vera” for short), which runs on every tweet.

Using a technology that's known for making shit up, for fact-checking, is so dumb, but it will probably bring in investors because AI.

[–] norkoris@lemmy.today 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Do they expect everything posted to be just news and information that can be fact-checked? Is this AI going to fact-check my opinions and shitposts too?

The homepage feels like AI slop too.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

Edit: it cost $20 to join?! I'm out

...As a "founder"; we'll see how long that lasts

but til then at least, I'm out too

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] manuremy@sopuli.xyz 140 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

So, I'm just checking..

  1. It is not open source?
  2. It uses AI to "Fact-Check"?
  3. It costs 20$ to join, and possibly more later?

Well, they have chosen interesting path those people behind this thing.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This will never amount to more than a cash grab.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] crakila@lemmy.world 117 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)
  • Cash grab on an old name and hoping people pony up the $20 to join it.
  • Not using ActivityPub or ATProto.

Yeah, it's already DOA.

If anyone is serious about creating a new centralised social network these days, they have already lost.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Shame. A new Twitter that supports all the open protocols would have been cool. Fediverse with a name people recognise.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Jinarched@lemmy.ca 83 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

2022: Come on, it's just 8$ it's basically the price of a coffee.

2026: Come on, it's just 20$ it's basically the price of a coffee.

[–] SGG@lemmy.world 44 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

2030: Come on, it's just 50 bottle caps, it's basically the price of a coffee.

[–] one_of_twelve@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] TootGuitar@sh.itjust.works 82 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It seems like maybe the commenters here thus far are missing the (obvious from the title) fact that this is not affiliated with Musk or “X” at all? I admire the aggressiveness of this move and I’ll be rooting for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 76 points 3 weeks ago

The real power move here would be to grab the domain name and run a free Mastodon instance off of it.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 65 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Yeah. "Lets try centralized algorithmic corporate social media again."

Im sure this attempt will end up just as wholesome.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Also, with a website that's clearly designed by AI.

What could go wrong

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 56 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Yeah i'il keep using mastodon and bluesky, also, they already have investors so it's dead at birth for me

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 66 points 3 weeks ago (20 children)

Bluesky is also owned by a corporation and, like Twitter, could sell to a fascist billionaire whenever they find it profitable to do so.

X vs Bluesky is a great microcosm of American team-sports politics. Mastodon is something actually new.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] antianarchist@sopuli.xyz 53 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yay, another centralized service owned by investors. And they want to build on “trust” lmao. Fuck off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago

Doesn’t appear to be federated. No reason to leave Mastodon.

[–] AgentSeven@lemmy.zip 44 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I didn't like Twitter enough to join it when it didn't cost $20.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] banause@feddit.org 41 points 3 weeks ago (25 children)

A Masto instance would have been cool. But that is just garbage.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 37 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (7 children)

A new and notable feature is the automated fact-checking tool, a Gemini-based “veracity engine for real-time analysis” (“Vera” for short), which runs on every tweet.

Bwahahahaa

Really? The Gemini that got Google sued and found liable for the misinformation it spread? That's who you wanna trust to check for "veracity"?

I'm not paying a $20 entry fee into a walled garden that wastes energy and water to have a text processor guess whether my arrangement of words resembles its training material closely enough.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 37 points 3 weeks ago

For $20? No thanks.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

And I'm going to keep dead naming X as Twitter until Musk stops dead naming his daughter. I never used the site in the first place, but that's besides the point.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 36 points 3 weeks ago

Twitter 2

Ooh

Gemini fact checking

Awww

[–] Carl@anarchist.nexus 36 points 3 weeks ago

Let me save you some trouble: It costs $20 to make an account.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 33 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Imo reviving Twitter as paid ai slop is just making a mockery of it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Toasticus@piefed.social 32 points 3 weeks ago

These guys are a bunch of morons. All of the comments here are proving as to why.

  • Associates with AI
  • Wants money to use it
  • Doesn't factor that Twitter might not entirely be available after all
  • Uses Musk's other imprints, like Grok, on it which may subject them to fail
  • More centralized social media is not what we need

I'll give it a few months before they actually are sued into oblivion, to which they'll have the biggest pikachu shocked faces possible.

[–] lookitsjustin@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 weeks ago

If nothing else we know this project will piss off Elon and that's always a plus.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 weeks ago

Twitter was awful before Musk bought it. Hard pass.

[–] juice702@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

New logo looks like shit compared to the old one

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A new and notable feature is the automated fact-checking tool, a Gemini-based “veracity engine for real-time analysis” (“Vera” for short), which runs on every tweet.

Lol, they added 'Grok is this true' to the entire platform, just dead on arrival.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

X registered and still owns Twitter according to the USPTO in class 38, 41, and 45.

The payment service applied for class 36, 41, 42. Class 41 is duplicate and a problem..

That said, X will have to prove its use in commerce to renew if contested and has a duty to defend it's brand. If my limited knowledge serves... Best luck.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›