this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
382 points (99.7% liked)

politics

30787 readers
1970 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump is openly hinting at taking over the midterm elections by declaring a national emergency.

Newsmax’s Wayne Allen Root interviewed Trump just after midnight Tuesday morning, and said that Trump had the right to declare a national security emergency next month, forcing through photo identification, proof of citizenship, limits on mail-in ballots, and other heavy voting restrictions. Trump seemed to like that suggestion, but didn’t want to tip his hand.

“Let me just say stranger things have happened, okay? I’ll leave it at that,” Trump said.

Trump is afraid of massive Republican losses in November’s midterms, and has been unsuccessfully pushing his allies in Congress to pass the draconian SAVE Act. With that appearing more unlikely each day, Democrats and other Trump critics are raising concerns that he may take drastic action, such as declaring a national emergency and maybe deploying legions of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to the polls.

In fact, Democrats have been trying for close to a year to get documents from the Department of Homeland Security regarding its policies and memos on sending ICE agents to polls. Agents were seen at polling places in Texas during its May primaries and in California in June, but when Democrats used the Freedom of Information Act to investigate, they were sent useless press clippings.

If Trump tries to invoke national security to take over federal elections, it would shatter precedent and could set off lawsuits and protests across the country. His repeated, disproven claims about voter fraud and rigged elections suggest that he’ll make the same excuses in November. The question is how to ensure a fair and accurate result that can stand up to his attacks.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter. This is going to be like 2020, where the outrage was so strong that it overwhelmed all their cheating schemes. That's why he's so fixated on that race. He knows he cheated, and should have won. If Biden won, it can only mean that he must have cheated worse, so if he can find evidence of Dem cheating, it will be end of the Dems, and MAGA will be in power forever.

He can't possibly believe that Biden had that many legal votes, because them he'd have to believe that he's hated that much, and he thinks people love him.

It's how a dumb 9 year-old thinks, but that's Trump.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

There is literally a quote by the buffoon that he hasn't changed since first grade.

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Just so we are clear, taking acts to directly impede the democratic process across the country.

That's High Treason, right?

Trump always lies about his accomplishments. He never lies about what he wants to do.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How are you all feeling about Democratic Socialist Francesca Hong's last second loss to Crowley in the Wisconsin primary after five USBs had the "wrong info" and a huge vote dump at the end to give the establishment Dem the win despite trailing massively? Myself, I'm of the opinion we can't trust our elections

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I haven’t trusted our elections since 2000 when Bush stole Florida. Even as a child it was obvious something was wrong.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 1 day ago

Agreed, I felt the same way.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago

If Trump tries to invoke national security to take over federal elections, it would shatter precedent and could set off lawsuits and protests across the country

Oh no... not lawsuits and protests! That will spell doom for him. No way he could ever recover from that.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

He has a compulsion to brag about his crimes.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

it would shatter precedent and could set off lawsuits

Lawsuits would be useless at that point, absolute performance theater.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

If someone openly talks about plotting to commit crime, something should be done to stop them

[–] disorderly@lemmy.world 82 points 3 days ago (16 children)

We need to all be eyeing the break glass solution: a general strike. If Trump subverts the elections, then we turn off the economy until fair elections are held.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (7 children)

It's all good in words, but I've got maybe 3 days worth of food at my place. So come day 5 I'm fucked

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 57 points 3 days ago (5 children)

That's why we're supposed to take care of each other in situations like that. My kitchen is overstocked and I'm a chef who knows how to make the most out of what's available. I share my food and you pitch in however you can.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

News at 6: Trump and his Heritage Foundation pals do more illegal shit with zero repercussions.

Establishment politicians: We fOlLow the LawS, dRasTic mEasUrEs are AntI-aMeRicAn!

Trump and Co.:

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As a former National Guard officer I am concerned that the Guard will be turned on us and most of the Guardsman will not push back. I live in the South and I know most of the state governors will do nothing. I hope the blue state governors do something. I hope the Guardsman remember their oath. I am not hopeful. Prepare for the worst.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

C'mon father time! What the hell is keeping you. And bring your friend with the scythe.

[–] alecbowles@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ceuta in Spain was just a trial to see how fired up would be the public reaction. They managed to organize 60,000 young men to crush the border in Spain.

While trump is not in great terms with Mexico gov, he’s certainly in good terms with other fascists in South America. If he pull out something like this on the US land border 2x 3x times bigger would be enough for him to declare national security emergency.

They managed to organize 60,000 young men to crush the border in Spain.

Once it became clear that they would not be granted asylum or allowed passage to the mainland, the overwhelming majority voluntarily returned to Morocco, leaving roughly 2,000 non-Moroccan nationals (predominantly from sub-Saharan Africa and Asia) being processed in Ceuta

[–] SpaceTimeInterval@lemmy.cafe 43 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Time to prepare for mass protests. Completely surround the White House if he does that.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This was the plan since day 1. Don’t act surprised now or when there are armed men at polling stations on Election Day.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

is it time that the UN starts to talk about putting [armed?] observers on the ground to make sute that the elections are not tampered with, like they do for other 3rd world countries?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChonkyLincoln@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 days ago

The Antichrist who hates America and is raping children while stealing billions doesn’t want to be held accountable? Crazy!

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago

He can try, states are going to vote though.

America held elections during the literal civil war, we can hold elections while an orange vapor balloon tried to fat on them.

We just need everyone to see what’s going on and overcome fear. Once people hear about this nonsense I expect any remaining people that aren’t awake yet but can be reached will wake up and they won’t tolerate it.

[–] bunnybunny@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He isn’t ‘mulling’ it or even considering it, it’s already set into motion. They’re going to steal the midterms. Everybody knows except for the American people it seems who will gladly except their already shithole country will become that even more

[–] datrenaissancebro@mtgzone.com 15 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I think you'll find that many Americans see this as the last bit of faith in the system they have left. If it gets pulled out of their hands, you're going to see a very different type of American.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›