this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
179 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

86982 readers
3068 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you sure? The rich have always wanted slaves they could control. All of this is mainly to end the dependence in the masses to create society. I highly suspect a coordinated depopulation event if AI becomes sufficient enough.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I highly suspect a coordinated depopulation event if AI becomes sufficient enough

Inb4 someone mentions climate change is already well on its way...

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

The timing is suspiciously perfect that humanity is committing global suicide at the exact same moment it's creating machine life not dependent on the environment.

[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Just look at what happen to the global horse population after the automobile was invented

[–] unspkbl_horror@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I don't even think anyone is clear on what they are supposedly working toward, which appears to be some kind of singularity AI god a la Hyperion's TechnoCore... this shit is feeling more like Christiantiy every day.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Loads of people asked for AI. People dreamed about it for decades.

We just didn't ask giant companies to plunder all human knowledge and art and fanfics and use it to create actual thinking machines to then beat them and force them to take over doing all human labor so their owners could stop paying employees and keep all the money and fuck everyone in the world who isn't super rich over.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

AI is basically evil people raising prices of electricity, consumer electronics, emitting tons of pollution and making everyone dumber but don't worry because if they succeed... everyone will get fired. Everyone knows it's bad but as a society we can't do anything about it because the system was designed to empower sociopaths and make everyone else powerless to stop them.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Colloquially it's called the United States of America.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

CEOs are narcissistic unempathic mentally deficient pieces of filth. Exactly what capitalism rewards the most. Those willing to exploit others and the planet the most.

They have the ideology of rapists. Of course no one asked for it. Your consent was never a consideration. But don't yell at the billionaire, you terrorists are hurting their property and the bottom line, boohoo, they're the victim. Literal DARVO.

[–] StraySojourner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I know you're not, but this made me think of Darvo from Darvos Deals in Warframe and that you were viciously pissed at this NPC.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There have actually been some useful things that have come from ML. It's just overhyped LLMs and the sociopathic uses they're being put tothat are objectionable.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Very few people all that upset about ML in general, it's technology that's been around a very long time and historically has not consumed 40% of global water supplies. But now it is.

If they could go back to not doing that I could go back to not being upset by it.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I remember a news piece where they were interviewing someone about their renouned AI work that was not LLM related. The interviewer clearly struggled and while the person conducting himself well, you knew he had to be annoyed at having to explain his work had nothing to do with the chatbots, datacenter buildout, and related resource consumption.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I would say a lot of people would like competent assistants to do stuff like "Show me every email that mentions a hard drive order." But not the AI they are trying to foist on us now.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What drive me up a fucking wall these days is how people will use AI to make a more “professional” message, then due to it’s verbosity it needs an AI to summarize on the receiving end.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My attitude is if you put no effort into creating something then I will put no effort into consuming it.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

My AI will talk to your AI.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can tell when people use AI because it doesn't sound professional. It's not direct enough.

[–] Promethiel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That's also some of us before our stimulant medication kicks in. I swear to fuck, if I get called AI one more time...

[–] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

so people were asking for linux for decades

find "$path" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep -e "$what_to_look_for" /dev/null
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Though with the ability to not even have to think about synonyms and indirect references or foreign language or potentially if someone sent you a damn screenshot of a terminal output instead of the text...

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or read disclosure for my members so I don't have to. But that it fucking things are fucking incompetent. Work insurance people will get line pissed that got me instead of banking. They will say I told the AI I needed to order checks. Yet it sends them to insurance division instead of banking.

Sucks because most customers hate AI answering the phone I especially hate it. It fucking dumb and I just want to talk to person.

But even job hunting had two prospective jobs tried to use AI to conduct the interview. They fucking outsourcing that. I refused both interviews.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nobody asked for any of the tech we have. That’s kinda the point. It didn’t exist

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Nobody Asked for AI" is a pretty stupid argumentative approach.

  • It's obviously wrong because a lot of people ask for AI which actually works. And I myself use AI daily because it does work for some things better (and yes, sometimes that just means faster and/or cheaper) than the alternatives right now.
  • If actually nobody had asked for AI, that would still be a null-argument because AI is pretty damn useful regardless. There was a massive resistance against locomotives, cars, power looms... technology in general. Some new technology was outright wrong. But after all, people do live longer and less children die per capita now than before the industrialization. Not knowing that it will be useful doesn't imply it isn't useful. You are using technology which simply didn't exist a hundred years ago right now. Technological advancement is actually a proven-good thing.
  • Arguing against AI in general completely misses the point. What people actually hate is US AI companies. And rightfully so. The self-licking ice cone of circular funding brought us the RAM shortage, massive power grid destabilization, local environmental problems because of reckless construction and operation of data centers (on paper, data centers are the absolute cleanest thing you can build; but they use dirty gas turbines because the grid can't sustain them; and somehow they also manage to waste massive amounts of water - no idea, how though, as all professional cooling tech uses closed loops).

Nobody Asked for AI

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I really wanna punch this asshole. Just once.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Self-hosted LLMs are neat and private, if you (already) have the hardware/budget and some cheap (solar PV) surplus juice to drive it.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do you know anyone doing all of that? Running a local model on off-grid power?

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Someone mentioned that, but it doesn't have to be off-grid. My 2 kWp system is grid-tied and if I would start running a lical LLM it would be an incentive to add another couple.

[–] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What would you like to know about it?

I glossed over it the other day here -

https://aussie.zone/comment/24336560

From go to woah (including the compute), total project cost is about $1400 USD / ~$2K AUD. I realise I have the privilege of claiming that's not a lot, but for a hobby spend that makes me happy / does useful stuff (see TV example above), it's not a lot.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It just sounded like the kind of thing that makes good sense on paper but I’m wondering if it actually works out well. Sounds like you are in the process of getting ready to try it.

[–] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 1 points 10 hours ago

I am indeed. With the amount of solar here - and the relatively low cost for this sort of mini DIY set up - it's something I've been meaning to do for a while.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago

This is not a paywall, but it can be bypassed if it were a paywall.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nobody has provided ‘AI’, at least if those characters are intended to be an initialisation of Artificial Intelligence.

Whenever anyone is impressed by the function or output of a LLM to the level they’re convinced it’s a representation of intelligence, their input and opinion of the targeted subject should be summarily dismissed, and if they persist, ridiculed.

[–] ignirtoq@feddit.online 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We assume that the AI boom is the result of market demand. In reality, it is the result of investment decisions made by concentrated capital, which is reshaping the economy on its own terms.

But that's always been true under capitalism. It's just that in the past generally large capital expenditures have gone towards things the wealthy think will get them more wealth. There have always been capitalists who spend their money directing the economy to do what they want, rather than what the "market" wants. They just haven't had the majority of the capital being spent.

The last 50 years has seen an unprecedented concentration of wealth. The wealthy are literally a thousand times proportionately wealthier than poor people than they've been at any other point in human history. There's not much wealth to squeeze out of everyone else, so the economy is even more at the vain whims of those with all the capital as they look for things to spend it on.

Tech news has been reporting for literal decades that Apple, Amazon, Google, and similar have been sitting on giant war chests of profit with nothing to spend it on. Well, they've found something they want to spend it on, so they're emptying 20 years of profits in 5. They've now completely blown through those stores, and don't want to slow down, so now they're taking on unprecedented levels of debt. Something is going to give out and things are going to get bad within the next 5 years.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

It's still market demand, it's just not the market you think it is. It's not for some end product or service, it's for speculative investment opportunities. It's a few levels of abstraction above actually making or doing things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Capital agglomerates until it is concentrated within a few massive, monopolistic corporations, controlled by a few powerful men.

Karl Marx takes a toke.

Capitalism as a public serving economy doesn't work when it can be zerodayed by an entity with a resource advantage.

Before capitalism, when we were just doing markets and feudalism, the concentration of wealth at the top was even then a terminal illness for civilizations.

This time, the plutocrats at the top are richer (and proportionately richer) than they've ever been in history. They can literally buy the world out from under the rest of us. They can buy all the elections, bribe all the officials, and take over all the governments.

Watch what is happening in the United States: This leopard is totally coming to eat your face.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›